Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R.K. Agrawal, J
Complainants – Appellant
Versus
Opposite Party – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in possession and obligations of the developer. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 9 , 15) |
| 2. contracts and fairness in compensation terms. (Para 10 , 11 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. consumer rights under the consumer protection act. (Para 12 , 14 , 21) |
| 4. court's guidelines on reasonable compensation for delays. (Para 17 , 20 , 24) |
1. In the Project, christened as “The Enclave†situated at Sector - 66, Gurgaon, Haryana, admeasuring super area 1920 sq. ft., launched by the Opposite Party, a Residential Unit, being Unit No. TEN - P - F01-03, was purchased by the Complainants in order to provide their family with quality standard of living in a spacious apartment. The Complainants are the subsequent Buyers of the Unit that had been purchased by them from one Ms. Archana Tanwar (hereinafter referred to as the Original Buyer) on 5.7.2013. Initially, the Original Buyer had booked one such Unit in the Project known as “The Meadows†of the Opposite Party but on the option given to her by the Opposite Party vide letter dated 8.6.2009 (Annexure C - 2), the booking was transferred to a new Project, namely, “The Enclave†and the Unit in question had been allotted to her vide Provisional Allo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
