Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Not mentioned, Not mentioned
builder co. – Appellant
Versus
complainants – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the builder-buyer dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments relating to pecuniary jurisdiction and compliance. (Para 4 , 6 , 12) |
| 3. court's emphasis on builder's responsibility for timely possession. (Para 5 , 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 4. assessment of compensation standards and consumer protection. (Para 13) |
| 5. final ruling and modifications to the state commission's order. (Para 15 , 16) |
1. This appeal under S.19 of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is in challenge to the Order dated 5.11.2018 of the State Commission in complaint No. 491 of 2017.
2. Mr. Arjun Jain, learned Counsel appears for the appellant (the 'builder co.'). Mr. Raktim Gogoi, learned Counsel appears for the respondents No. 1 and No. 2 (the 'complainants'). The respondent No. 1 (the 'complainant No. 1') present in person also makes his submissions.
The record including inter alia the State Commission's impugned Order dated 5.11.2018 and memorandum of appeal has been perused.
3. The matter pertains to a builder - buyer dispute. Briefly, the builder co. entered into an agreement with the complainants in respect of the subject flat on 14.9.2010. The total consideration of the unit was Rs.56,36,404.06. The
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
