Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R.K. Agrawal, J
Pawan Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the jurisdiction and process for filing a revision petition. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. details surrounding the purchase of an insurance policy and events leading to the claim. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. the court's analysis on the validity of dishonouring the cheque and insurance liability. (Para 5 , 11 , 14) |
| 4. arguments presented regarding the responsibilities of the bank and insurer. (Para 6 , 10 , 12) |
| 5. final decisions confirming the dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 13 , 15) |
1. The present Revision Petition No. 1094 of 2015 under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 (for short "the Act") is filed by Pawan Kumar Gupta (hereinafter referred to as the Petitioner / Complainant) against State bank of India and Others (hereinafter "referred to as the Respondents / Opposite Parties) challenging the Impugned Order dated 19/01/2015 of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Chandigarh, Punjab (hereinafter referred to as the "State Commission") in FA - No. 1616 of 2012.
2. The brief facts leading upto the present case are that the Petitioner purchased an Insurance Policy from Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company limited (One of the Respondents) vide cover note No.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
