Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Unknown, J
Punjab National Bank v. Abha Jain
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the fixed deposits and complaint against bank. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's observations on sufficiency of evidence and bank's obligations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. discussion on the limits of revisional jurisdiction. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. overall decision to dismiss the petition. (Para 12) |
1. Delayed condoned.
2. Challenge in this Revision Petition under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short “the Actâ€) by the Petitioners / Opposite Parties in the Complaint, is to the Order dated 14.12.2017 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow (in short “the State Commissionâ€) in First Appeal No. 170 of 2011. By the impugned Order, the State Commission has dismissed the Appeal filed by the Petitioners questioning the legality of the Order dated 1.1.2011 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Meerut (in short, “the District Forumâ€) in Consumer Complaint No. 55/2008. By the said Order, the District Forum while allowing the Complaint preferred by the Complainant, had directed the Petitioner Bank to refund a sum of 40,000 to the Complainant towards the value of the Fixed Deposit Receip
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
