SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7318

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Unknown, J
Punjab National Bank v. Abha Jain


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Unknown
For the Respondents: Unknown

1. Delayed condoned.

2. Challenge in this Revision Petition under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short “the Act”) by the Petitioners / Opposite Parties in the Complaint, is to the Order dated 14.12.2017 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow (in short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No. 170 of 2011. By the impugned Order, the State Commission has dismissed the Appeal filed by the Petitioners questioning the legality of the Order dated 1.1.2011 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Meerut (in short, “the District Forum”) in Consumer Complaint No. 55/2008. By the said Order, the District Forum while allowing the Complaint preferred by the Complainant, had directed the Petitioner Bank to refund a sum of 40,000 to the Complainant towards the value of the Fixed Deposit Receipt along with interest @ 15% p.a from the date of fixed deposit till last payment, pay 10,000 as compensation for mental and economic damage and also to pay a sum of 5,000 as costs towards litigation.

3. The facts material to the case are that when the Complainant was minor, her grand - mother Late Smt. Ganga Devi, o











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top