Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Deepa Sharma (Presiding Member)
Ankur Sharma v. Adani M2k Projects Llp
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint filed under consumer protection act regarding possession delay. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. opposition argues possession timeline adhered to as per buyer’s agreement. (Para 4 , 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. legal precedents cited indicate responsibilities of allottees regarding possession acceptance. (Para 9 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court maintains complainants must accept possession while entitled to compensation. (Para 10 , 14) |
1. This complaint is filed under S.21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act , 1986 by the complainants in respect of a flat booked by them in a project promoted and executed by the opposite party on the grounds that there has been inordinate delay in completion of the same and seeking refund of the money along with damages.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the complainants booked a flat on 21.10.2012 in the project ‘Oyster Grande’ being developed by the opposite party in Sector 102 / 102 A, Gurgaon, Haryana and were allotted flat No. F 1904, measuring 1409 sq ft (super area 1889 sq ft) vide allotment letter dated 9.1.2013. An Apartment Buyer’s Agreement was executed on 11.6.2013 between the complainants and the OP. A sum of Rs. 1,28,77,558 was paid by t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
