SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7326

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
A, J
Baidyanath Mondal v. Kanahaya Lal Rathi


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Kanhaiya Lal Rathi
For the Respondents: N/A

1. The present Revision Petition is filed by the Petitioner under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act , 1986 against Order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Appeal No. 463/2014 dated 19.7.2016 whereby the Appeal filed by the Complainant was dismissed.

2. The Revision Petition has been filed with a delay of 116 days. For the reasons stated in the application and in the interest of justice, the delay is condoned.

3. Case of the Complainant / Petitioner is that he purchased 2,000 equity shares of Aravinda Remedies and 200 equity shares of Reliance Power Ltd. by making payment of Rs. 13,700 and Rs. 49,400 respectively. The Opposite Party delivered 1.000 shares of Aravinda Remedies instead of 2.000 shares amounting to Rs. 6,850 leaving a refundable amount of Rs. 6,850. Further, the Opposite Party delivered 200 shares of Reliance Power Ltd. amounting to Rs. 47,440 leaving a refundable amount of Rs. 1,960. When the Complainant enquired about his Demat Account, he came to know that 200 shares of Reliance Power Ltd. were transferred to the account of Ureka Stock & Share Broking Services wi





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top