Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Not Stated, Not Stated
Original Complainant – Appellant
Versus
Life Insurance Corporation of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. insurance claim processes require full disclosure. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. delay in claims processing triggers liability for deficiency in service. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. fraudulent suppression of information voids insurance claims. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court upheld the ruling not to provide the sum assured. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
1. The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Original Complainant under S.21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the Order dated 5.11.2009, passed by the Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Pandri, Raipur, (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Appeal No. 36/2009, preferred by Life Insurance Corporation of India, the Opposite Party / Respondent herein (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent / Insurance Company). By the Impugned Order, the State Commission while reversing the Order dated 23.12.2008, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Durg (hereinafter referred to as the District Commission) in Complaint Case No. 251/2007, filed by the Complainant / Petitioner, has disposed of the Appeal filed by the Respondent / Insurance Company, with a direction to the Respondent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
