Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R.K. Agarwal, President
Nagesh Maruti Utekar Ronita Mitra v. Sunstone Developers Joint Venture
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background on consumer complaints and developer obligations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by opposing counsels regarding breach of contract. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court reasoning regarding the obligations of developers and unfair contract terms. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. decision on compensation awarded to complainants due to delay. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 5. final ruling on the case outcomes. (Para 19) |
1. The present batch of Consumer Complaints has been filed by the Complainants, against the Opposite Party, Sunstone Developers Joint Venture seeking compensation for delayed delivery of the Flats booked by them in the complex to be constructed by the Opposite Party Developer in the name and style of “Hubtown Sunstoneâ€, within stipulated period.
2. Since the facts and question of law involved in these Complaints are similar except for minor variations in the dates and events and flat numbers, these Complaints are being disposed of by this common Order. However, for the sake of convenience, Consumer Complaint No. 12 of 2017 is treated as the lead case and the facts enumerated hereinafter are taken from Consumer Complaint No. 12 of 2017.
3. B
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
