NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Ram Surat Ram Maurya (Presiding Member)
Mr. Navneet Kumar, Advocate – Appellant
Versus
Mr. Pragyan Pradip Sharma, Advocate and Ms. Nidhi Tewari, Advocate – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complainants claim refunds and compensation for construction delays. (Para 2 , 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. defendant's objections regarding complainants' eligibility raised. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court emphasizes timely possession and compensation rights. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 17) |
| 4. refund and interest obligations outlined for builders. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. final ruling for partial refund and interest. (Para 18) |
1. Heard Mr. Navneet Kumar, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. Pragyan Pradip Sharma, Advocate and Ms. Nidhi Tewari, Advocate, for the opposite parties.
2. Aforementioned complaint has filed for directing the opposite parties (i) to refund each and every buyer, the amount paid by him / her with interest @18% per annum, from respective date of deposit till the date of refund, in respect of the apartment booked by him / her in the project Park Sentosa, at village Nimka, Sector - 77, tehsil and district Faridabad, (ii) to pay compensation to each and every buyer @ Rs. 5 per sq.ft. per month on ˜super area, for the period of delay in offering possession of the flats booked by them, (iii) to pay Rs. 5 lacs, to each and every buyers, as compensation for mental agony and harassme

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.