Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R. K. Agrawal (President), Binoy Kumar (Member)
Deepika Chaudhary Chandra and Arun Kumar Chandra – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Emaar MGF Land Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim regarding delayed possession and unilaterality of agreement terms. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. discussion on jurisdictional matters and consumer definitions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. final ruling regarding compensation and directive for action. (Para 10 , 11 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. determination of delay compensation eligibility and computation methodology. (Para 12 , 15) |
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under S.21(a)(i), S.22(1) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the Act) against Opposite Party M/s. Emaar MGF Land Limited (hereinafter referred to as OP Developer) by Deepika Chaudhary Chandra and her husband Arun Kumar Chandra, Complainants / Allottees of Residential Apartment in a Group Housing Project, namely, Palm Terrace Select (for short the Project), to be developed and constructed by the OP Developer in Village Badshahpur, Sector 66, Gurugram, Haryana, seeking compensation towards delayed delivery of the possession of the allotted Apartment / Unit besides other reliefs.
2. According to the Complainant, the brief facts giving rise to filing of the present Complaint are that allured by the advertisement and the assurances given b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
