Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
N/A, N/A
Sujeet Jain – Appellant
Versus
M/s. D B Realty Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complainant details the issue of delayed possession and claims. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. opposite party contests the consumer status based on purchase intent. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court examines definitions under consumer protection act for a ruling. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. complaint dismissed as the nature of purchase deemed commercial. (Para 10 , 11) |
1. Heard Mr. Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Sonam Gupta, Advocate, for the complainant and Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Swati Sinha, Advocate, for opposite party.
2. Sujeet Jain has filed above complaint for directing the opposite party to pay (i) Interest @21% per annum, on the total cost of Rs.1,47,34,751 borne by the complainant, for Apartment No.2801 and Rs.1,42,97,277 for Apartment No.2802, for the delayed period of 45 months in delivery of possession, (ii) Rs.20 lacs, as compensation, for mental agony and harassment and (iii) any other relief which may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. The complainant stated that M/s. D B Realty Limited (the opposite party) was a company, incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of develo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
