Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Rajesh Shankar, J
Anju Vinod Saraswat v. Sahara Prime City Limited
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delayed possession and refund claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. consumer rights under the act. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. deficiency in service established due to delays. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. onus on the opposite party to prove investor status. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's final order for refund and compensation. (Para 11 , 12) |
1. This complaint is filed under S.21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter 'Act') alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice by M/s Sahara Prime City Limited, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, the opposite party, in respect of an independent semi - detached house booked by the complainants in project 'Sahara Prime City', Hardoi Road, Lucknow (in short 'the project') promoted and developed by the opposite party.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the complainant had booked an independent, semi - detached house (hereinafter, the 'Unit') with the opposite party in the project on 29.7.2011 by paying a booking amount of Rs. 5.29.594. As per letter dated 29.7.2011 issued by the opposite party, Unit No. S4/12A (Unit Code 061) with unit area 292.81 sq m and plot area of 278.90 sq m was allotted to the complainant at a sale conside
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
