Bimalkumar Bhattacharya v. Thomas Cook (India) Limited

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7430

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Not mentioned, J
Bimalkumar Bhattacharya v. Thomas Cook (India) Limited

Table of Content
1. facts of appeal against state consumer dispute redressal commission's order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments on jurisdictional issues during appeal dismissal. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court observations on limitations in revisional jurisdiction and concurrent findings. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. final decision to dismiss the revision petition. (Para 12)

1. This revision petition assails the order of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Gujarat (in short, 'State Commission') in Appeal No. 51/2019 dated 2.7.2019 dismissing the appeal against the order of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Vadodara (in short, 'District Forum') in Complaint No. 541 of 2016 dated 5.1.2019.

2. The facts of the case in brief are that the petitioner approached the respondent who is in the travel and tourism business to book a tour to Europe, including sight - seeing trip in London in 2015. He booked a sightseeing tour in London for one person on 26th & 27th August, 2015 and for two persons on 29th August, 2015 and a holiday package for Europe of 14 nights and 15 days from 30th August, 2015 to 13th September, 2015 through the respondent at a cost of Rs 5,94,232 which was paid in in