SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R. K. Agrawal, J
Complainants – Appellant
Versus
Opposite Party – Respondent


Table of Content
1. consumer complaint regarding unfulfilled property purchase agreements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 6)
2. opposite party's claims attempting to negate consumer rights. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court confirmed that consumer rights are unaffected by builder's claims. (Para 7 , 9)
4. recognition of limitations on builder's excuses for delays. (Para 8)
5. ruling reaffirming the right to refund due to service deficiency. (Para 10 , 11)

1. The present joint Complaint has been filed under S.12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 , as a class action on behalf of and for the benefit of all the allottees in the project "ANTRIKSH SANSKRITI" situated at NH - 24, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad (U.P.). Along with the Complaint, the Complainants also filed IA / 9267/2017, an application for permission to file joint Complaint. This Commission, vide order dated 11.4.2018, allowed the application. Complainant No. 1 is the authorized representative for other Complainants as stated in the affidavit.

2. The case of the Complainants is that in 2011 through advertisements Opposite Party No. 1 expressed their intention to the General Public to develop the aforesaid project and to handover the flats to all purcha




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top