Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
T. A. H. Vohra, J
Yogender Mohan Kanwar v. Forte Point India Pvt. Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint filed under consumer protection act for delayed possession. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. opposite party contests the complaint citing delays due to another party. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court observes the complainant's rights as a consumer and contractual obligations. (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. court rules in favor of complainant due to inordinate delay, ordering a refund. (Para 15 , 17) |
1. This complaint has been filed under S.21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ˜Act) alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice in respect of a flat booked by them with the opposite party viz., Forte Point India Pvt. Ltd., in a project promoted and developed by it and seeking refund of the amount deposited along with interest and other compensation.
2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the complainant had booked a three bedroom residential flat admeasuring 1,762 sq ft in a group housing project ˜The Olive Spire in Sector 70A, Gurgaon (in short, the ˜project) being developed and promoted by the opposite party as the first Residential Green Building Project. The construction was promised to be completed within 36 months along with vari
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
