Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Mr. U.C. Mittal, Ms. Priyashree Sharma, JJ
Rekha Sanjay Pal v. Rockline Construction Co.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer complaint initiated regarding property possession delay. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. opposite party asserts compliance with agreement terms. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court evaluates delay and compensation matters. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. delay of two months deemed not inordinate. (Para 7) |
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under S.21 of the Consumer Protection Act , 1986 (for short the Act) against Opposite Party No. 1, Rockline Construction Co. (hereinafter referred to as Opposite Party Builder), through Opposite Party No. 2, Mr. Narinderpal Gupta, Sole Proprietor of Opposite Party No. 1.
2. The brief facts of the case are that allured by an advertisement published by the Opposite Party Builder offering Flats in their Residential Project known as ˜RNA Royal Parksituated at Building No. 1 bearing survey No. 47, CTS No. 1016, 1016-1 to 4 at Village Kanjur, Taluka Kurla (hereinafter referred to as the Project) and specifically mentioning that the Project is Ready Possession with OC ” No Service Tax ” NO VAT, the Complainants booked a Flat in the said Project by paying a sum of Rs. 28,54,270.25ps. towards upfront money of the total sale consideration of Rs. 2,02,91,304 on 2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
