NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Ram Surat Ram Maurya (Presiding Member), Dr. Inder Jit Singh (Member)
Amit Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Berry Developers & Infrastructure Private Limited – Respondent
1. Heard Ms. Rekha Aggarwal, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. Vishnu Anand, Advocate, for the opposite party.
2. Amit Mittal (complainant - 1) has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) refund entire amount deposited by the complainant and all other similarly situated flat buyers with interest @ 18% per annum, from the date of respective deposits till the date of refund, (ii) to pay Rs. 11,000 as cost of the litigation; and (iii) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. Above complaint was filed as a representative complaint under S.12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 , for which, leave was granted vide order dated 5.3.2019. Thereafter, six more flat buyers were impleaded time to time on their applications.
3. The complainants stated that Berry Developers & Infrastructure Private Limited (the opposite party) was a company, registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of development and construction of group housing projects and selling its units to the prospective buyers. The opposite party launched a group housing project, in the name of BDI Ambaram at villages Mirchu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.