Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R. K. Agrawal (President), Dr. S. M. Kantikar (Member), *Binoy Kumar (Member)
M/s Mehndiratta Foods Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of consumer complaint. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. insurance coverage details. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. surveyor report assessment. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 17) |
| 5. final judgment and compensation award. (Para 18 , 19 , 22 , 24) |
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed by the M/s Mehndiratta Foods Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant) under S.21(a) read with S.12 and S.13 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against National Insurance Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Opposite Party No.1 / Insurance Company / Insurer) and Nainital Bank Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Opposite Party No.2 / Bank) with main prayer to pay compensation, as claimed, along with other prayer.
2. The Complainant stated that they were carrying on the business of manufacturing and marking of chips, namkeen, etc. under the brand name of Rajmahal etc. The Bank / Opposite Party No.2 provided credit facility and secured loan facilities to the Complainant for carrying out its business and also, being an Agent of Insurance Company / Opposite Party No.1, helped provide an insurance
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
