NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R.K. Agrawal, J
Chief Administrator, Haryana Sahari Vikas Pradhikaran – Appellant
Versus
Darshna Sethi – Respondent
1. Delay condoned.
2. By this Revision Petition, under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short"the Act"), the Chief Administrator, Haryana Sahari Vikas Pradhikaran / Opposite Party in the Complaint before the District Forum (for short "the HSVP") question the correctness and legality of the Order dated 07/01/2022 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana at Panchkula (for short "the State Commission") in First Appeal No. 373 of 2021. By the Impugned Order, the State Commission has dismissed the Appeal, preferred by the HSVP against the Order dated 27/10/2021 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad (for short "the District Forum") in Consumer Complaint No. 322 of 2021. The District Forum while allowing the Complaint filed by the Complainant has directed the HSVP to allot and give the physical possession of the Plot No. 316 of Sector 21 or Plot Nos. 277 or 278 of Sector 31to the Complainant in lieu of the originally allotted Plot No. 87 of Sector 21 C III, Faridabad if lyingvacant without litigation. The HSVP was also directed not to create a third party interest on the aforesaid plots and to further pay interest
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.