Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R.K. Agrawal, J
Chief Administrator, Haryana Sahari Vikas Pradhikaran – Appellant
Versus
Darshna Sethi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature and entitlement of the complainant. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. analysis of consumer rights and the obligation of hsvp. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. assessment of jurisdictional limits and overall reasonings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. final ruling regarding the dismissal of the petition. (Para 11 , 12) |
1. Delay condoned.
2. By this Revision Petition, under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short"the Act"), the Chief Administrator, Haryana Sahari Vikas Pradhikaran / Opposite Party in the Complaint before the District Forum (for short "the HSVP") question the correctness and legality of the Order dated 07/01/2022 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana at Panchkula (for short "the State Commission") in First Appeal No. 373 of 2021. By the Impugned Order, the State Commission has dismissed the Appeal, preferred by the HSVP against the Order dated 27/10/2021 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad (for short "the District Forum") in Consumer Complaint No. 322 of 2021. The District Forum while allowing the Complaint filed by the Complainant has directed the HSVP to allot and give the physical possession of the Plot No. 316
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
