Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Ashok Bhan, J
Badri Narayan v. Young India Engineers
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer complaint regarding possession of flat after full payment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. appeal barred by limitation; petition allowed. (Para 4 , 7 , 11) |
| 3. delay in possession delivery constitutes deficiency in service. (Para 5 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. defendant's claims of default rejected due to no notices sent. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 5. final decision to allow the petition. (Para 12) |
1. This revision petition filed under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the 'Act - ) assails the order of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, circuit Bench at Aurangabad (in short, 'State Commission - ) in First Appeal No. 625 of 2011 dated 20/02/2015 arising out of order dated 30/06/2010 in complaint No. 263 of 2010 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Aurangabad (in short, 'District Forum').
2. The brief facts of the case as stated by the petitioner are that he booked Flat No. 102, North Avenue, Plot Nos. 27 & 28, N - 5 / J, Cidco, Aurangabad for a sale consideration of Rs.5,90,000 on 06/09/1999 by paying an advance of Rs.5,000 by cheque to the respondent. A further sum of Rs.88,000 was paid by way of 6 installments between 13/09/1999 and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
