Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
C. Viswanath (Presiding Member), *Subhash Chandra (Member)
Vinod v. Lekhra Beej Bhandar
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of case and initial facts. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against the state commission's order. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. legal understanding of agricultural disputes regarding seed quality. (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's observations about the burden of proof. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. final ruling and affirmation of district forum's decision. (Para 11) |
1. This revision petition filed under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act , 1986 (in short, the 'Act') assails the order of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula (in short, 'State Commission') in First Appeal No. 288 of 2015, dated 9.12.2015 arising out of order dated 20.11.2014 in complaint No. 415 of 2013 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Sonepat (in short, 'District Forum').
2. The brief facts of the case as stated by the petitioner are that he is an agriculturist owning land in Ram Nagar village, Tehsil Ganaur, District Sonepat. He had bought 3 kg okra (bhindi) seeds at the rate of Rs.1,200 per kg vide bill no 230 dated 22.5.2013 from respondent No. 1. The seeds were sown as per instructions and supervision directed by the respondent No. 1 after preparing the fields as
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
