SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Sudip Ahluwalia (Member), Binoy Kumar (Member), JJ.
Prashant Telkar and Vijeta Kalghatgi v. ND Developers Pvt. Ltd.


1. The present Joint Consumer Complaint (on behalf of 55 Buyers) is filed under S.12(1)(c) read with S.13(6) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the "Act") read with O.1 R.8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the Complainants / Buyers against ND Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Others (hereinafter referred to as the Opposite Parties) seeking refund of entire amount collected from them towards consideration of the respective Units along with interest on the ground of delay in construction of the Project.

2. The facts leading upto the present Complaint are that the Complainants / Buyers booked a Unit in the Project "ND Laurel" of the Opposite Parties situated at Gunjur Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Karnataka. The Agreement between the Complainants / buyers and the Opposite Party No.1 (ND Developers Pvt. Ltd. / Developer) had been entered and the Opposite Party No.1 to undertake the construction of the flats and handover the legal possession of the same to the Complainants. Other Opposite Parties are the landowners, who had offered the land to the Opposite Party No.1 for development and construction of the flats. All the Opposite Parties are parties to the Agre





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top