Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Sudip Ahluwalia (Member), Binoy Kumar (Member), JJ.
Prashant Telkar and Vijeta Kalghatgi v. ND Developers Pvt. Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complainants seek refund due to delay in possession. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. opposite party argues complaint is barred by limitation. (Para 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. delay in construction implies liability for refund and compensation. (Para 16 , 22) |
| 4. complaint partly allowed with directives for refund and construction completion. (Para 23 , 24) |
1. The present Joint Consumer Complaint (on behalf of 55 Buyers) is filed under S.12(1)(c) read with S.13(6) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the "Act") read with O.1 R.8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the Complainants / Buyers against ND Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Others (hereinafter referred to as the Opposite Parties) seeking refund of entire amount collected from them towards consideration of the respective Units along with interest on the ground of delay in construction of the Project.
2. The facts leading upto the present Complaint are that the Complainants / Buyers booked a Unit in the Project "ND Laurel" of the Opposite Parties situated at Gunjur Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Karnataka. The Agreement between the Complainants / buyers and the Opposite Party No.1 (ND Developers Pvt. Ltd. / Develop
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
