Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Shri D.K. Jain, CJ
Sri Dharani Constructions v. Yella Sunanda
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and nature of revision petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations of deficiency in construction. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. dismissal of initial complaint. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. findings of the state commission. (Para 7) |
| 5. arguments and counterarguments presented. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. final observations and dismissal. (Para 11 , 12) |
1. Present Revision Petitions under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short "the Act") have arisen out of the order of the A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (for short "the State Commission") in First Appeal No. 725/2008, dated 29/12/2010.
2. Since both the Revision Petitions arise out of the same order dated 29/12/2010 passed by the State Commission, they are taken up together through this common order. To facilitate easy understanding, the Parties in this order are being referred to as the Complainant, Developer as Opposite Party No. 1 and Owners as Opposite Party No. 2 and Opposite Party No. 3 as arrayed before the District Forum.
3. The Complainant stated that he approached the Opposite Parties and booked Flat No. 305 in 3rd floor of 'Prashanth Heights'. Complainant purchased the flat for a sale consi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
