Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Not Mentioned,
M/s Hyundai Engineering and Construction Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M/s United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of consumer complaints regarding insurance claims and the initiation of the process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. circumstances surrounding the bridge collapse and investigation findings. (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments presented by complainants and insurance company regarding design and liability. (Para 14 , 15 , 18) |
| 4. court's examination of previous findings, expert opinions, and justification of the insurance company's actions. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. final ruling regarding compensation to be paid by the insurance company. (Para 29 , 33) |
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed by the Complainants, i.e. M/s Hyundai Engineering and Construction Co. Ltd. and M/s Gammon India Limited (hereinafter collectively to be referred to as the "Complainants") against the Opposite Parties, i.e. M/s United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (Head Office at Chennai), Opposite Party No.1, M/s United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (Divisional Office at Mylapore, Chennai), Opposite Party No.2 (hereinafter collectively to be referred to as "the Insurance Company") and National Highway Authority of India, Proforma Opposite Party (hereinafter to be referred to as the "NHAI"), alleging defi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
