NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Ms. Nikita Sharma, J
Ajay Kumar Verma v. Aims Max Gardenia Developers Pvt. Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the case and claims by complainants. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of contractual agreements and commitments made by the opposite party. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments presented and overview of evidence. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's evaluation of the claims related to delayed possession. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. final decision and directive regarding compensation. (Para 11) |
1. Heard Ms. Nikita Sharma, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. Rishi Awasthi, Advocate, for the opposite party.
2. Initially 45 sets of home buyers of the project "Golf City" have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) deliver possession of apartment allotted to them in the project "Golf City", complete in all respect as per specifications with promised amenities and facilities and execute conveyance deed in their favour; (ii) pay compensation @ Rs.10 per sq.ft., per month on super area, for first six months from March, 2013 onwards and penalty @ 12% per annum on total amount paid by the buyers for delay beyond August, 2013 till the delivery of possession; (iii) pay Rs.3,00,000 to each buyer, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; and (iv) any other relief which
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.