SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Ms. Nikita Sharma, J
Ajay Kumar Verma v. Aims Max Gardenia Developers Pvt. Ltd.


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Nikita Sharma
For the Respondents: Mr. Rishi Awasthi

1. Heard Ms. Nikita Sharma, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. Rishi Awasthi, Advocate, for the opposite party.

2. Initially 45 sets of home buyers of the project "Golf City" have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) deliver possession of apartment allotted to them in the project "Golf City", complete in all respect as per specifications with promised amenities and facilities and execute conveyance deed in their favour; (ii) pay compensation @ Rs.10 per sq.ft., per month on super area, for first six months from March, 2013 onwards and penalty @ 12% per annum on total amount paid by the buyers for delay beyond August, 2013 till the delivery of possession; (iii) pay Rs.3,00,000 to each buyer, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; and (iv) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. Leave under S.12(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act , 1986, for filing the complaint in representative capacity has been granted on 01.02.2019. The opposite party obtained "occupation certificate" in respect of Towers C - 2, E - 2, F - 2, G - 2, H - 2 and 12 of the project on 11.7.2018. This Commission, vide order date











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top