NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Not mentioned, Not mentioned
Rajrani Cold Storage & Ice Factory v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content so I can generate the key points with the appropriate references.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint filed under consumer protection act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. opposite party's denial and reason for claim repudiation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's examination of evidence regarding collapse. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. reviewed structural defects and reliability of surveyor's findings. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. final ruling dismissing the complaint. (Para 13) |
1. This complaint under S.21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the 'Act') has been filed seeking the settlement of claim filed with the opposite party with compensation alleging deficiency in service.
2. The complainant has stated that he had obtained a certificate of stability for the building of the cold storage from a Chartered Engineer and Architect on 7.12.2009 prior to renewal of the licence of the cold storage for the period 1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010 under the UP Cold Storage Act, 1976 issued by the Licensing Authority (Cold Storage) & District Magistrate, Mahamayanagar (Hathras), UP. He had obtained 6 valid insurance policies including for Standard Fire & Special Perils (SPSP), Deterioration of Stock (Potatoes) and Plant and Machinery and has stated that these covered the building, plant and mach

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.