NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Ms. Anubha Aggarwal, ACJ, Mr. Rahul Kriplani, ACJ
Sanjiv Kumar Jain v. Lodha Crown Buildmart Private Limited
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in possession justifies claims for refunds. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments concerning consumer status and the applicability of amendments. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's ruling reflects on entitlements due to unreasonable delay. (Para 15 , 16) |
1. Heard Ms. Anubha Aggarwal, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. Rahul Kriplani, Advocate, for the opposite party.
2. Above complaints have been filed for directing Lodha Crown Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. (the opposite party) to (i) handover possession of the apartments, within stipulated period and in no case, later than 30.6.2017; (ii) pay interest @ 18% per annum, compounded quarterly on the amount deposited by the complainants from the date of deposit till offer of possession; (iii) refund excess amount deposited by the complainants with interest @18% per annum, compounded quarterly from the date of deposit till the date of refund; (iv) consider advance deposit of the complainants under "My Gain" scheme and pay interest on it; (v) withdraw demand letters wherein interest is being charged from the complainants; (vi) pay Rs.20,00,000 as punitive damages; (vii) pay Rs.20,00,000, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; (viii)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.