Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
* R. K. Agrawal (President), Dr. S. M. Kantikar (Member)
Rockline Construction Company v. Shekh Mohammad Jamil
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and procedural history of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdiction and consumer status. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's findings on complaint maintainability and definition of consumer. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. conclusion on deficiency of service and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 17 , 18) |
1. This Appeal has been filed by M/s. Rockline Construction Co. (hereinafter referred to as the Builder / Developer), Opposite Party No.2 in the Complaint, against the Order dated 10.10.2012, passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Consumer Complaint No. CC / 11/91, whereby the State Commission had allowed the Complaint and directed the Complainants to make balance payment of Rs.49,68,250 to the Builder / Developer, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of the said Order or to deposit the said amount in the State Commission if the Builder / Developer refuse to accept the said amount. Thereafter, the Builder / Developer was directed to deliver the vacant and peaceful possession of Flat No. 1509, having carpet area admeasuring 103
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
