SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 18219

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R. K. Agrawal (President)
Finance Company – Appellant
Versus
Complainant – Respondent


1. The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner / Opposite Party Nos. 1 and 2 in the Complaint (hereinafter to be referred to as "the Finance Company") under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 (for short "the Act") against the Order dated 28.11.2016 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh at Luck now (for short "the State Commission") in First Appeal Nos. 1328 of 2015 and 1617 of 2015. By the Impugned Order, the State Commission while affirming the finding of facts returned by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Allahabad (for short, "the District Forum") had dismissed both the First Appeals preferred by the Complainant as well as Petitioner herein. The District Forum vide its Order dated 22.5.2015 had partly allowed the Complaint filed by the Complainant and had directed the Opposite Party Nos. 1 & 2 / Petitioner herein to pay an amount of Rs.3,25,000, the value of the vehicle in question to the Complainant along with interest @ 8% p.a. from the date of filing of Complaint till the date of actual payment. The Complainant was also awarded Rs.50,000 as compensation and Rs.5,000 as costs of the litigation.

2. At
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top