Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
String, J
Aashutosh Pramod Srivastava & Savivek Pramod Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Rahul Patil & Ruby Hall Clinic – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complainant's claim based on alleged medical negligence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's assessment of evidence proceedings and treatment adequacy. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. legal standards for establishing medical negligence. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. final ruling of complaint dismissal. (Para 12) |
1. The present Complaint has been filed under S.21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by Aashutosh Pramod Srivastava & his brother Savivek Pramod Srivastava (hereinafter referred to as the 'Complainants') against the Opposite Parties Dr. Rahul Patil (OP - 1) & Ruby Hall Clinic (OP - 2), for the alleged medical negligence and wrong treatment which resulted into untimely death of their mother.
2. The Complaint
2.1 The Complainants' mother, Mrs. Veena Pramod Srivastava, (since 'deceased', hereinafter referred to as the 'patient') was suffering from anxiety and diabetes. On 3.6.2015, she complained uneasiness, and restlessness. Initially, treatment form local doctor was taken who suggested consulting a cardiologist. Thereafter, she was taken to Inamdar Hospital wherein no experienced cardiologist was available. Therefore, she took discharge and on 5.6.2015, taken to Dr. Rahul Patil, a cardiologis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
