Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
A, B, JJ
Rajasthan Housing Board v. Devendra Kumar
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the case background and factual basis. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding payment disputes and cancellation notice. (Para 3 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence and notification adequacy. (Para 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 4. reflection on the issue of limitations and service of notice. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. final ruling on the revision petition's merits. (Para 10) |
1. This revision petition under S.21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the 'Act') assails the order dated 8.5.2014 in Appeal No. 814 of 2012 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench - II, Jaipur, Rajasthan (in short, the 'State Commission') dismissing the appeal and upholding order dated 22.5.2012 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jodhpur (in short, the 'District Forum') in Consumer Case No. 771 of 2010.
2. The facts of the case according to the petitioner, in brief, are that it had registered the respondent under the Gharonda Scheme for the year 2004 as per his application dated 29.12.2004 on payment of Rs 2,500. Although seed money of Rs 3,000 was not deposited by him before draw of lots, despite letter dated 21.5.2005, the petitioner allotted house no 5/1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
