NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Subhash Chandra (Presiding Member)
Murugesen v. Bank of Baroda
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer complaint for indemnification due to natural calamity. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding responsibility for insurance premiums and coverage. (Para 4 , 7 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. court's evaluation of insurance policy terms. (Para 6 , 8 , 15) |
| 4. final ruling and dismissal of the complaint. (Para 17) |
1. This consumer complaint under S.21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, ˜the Act') is filed alleging deficiency in service and seeking compensation with interest in respect of loss suffered on account of natural calamity under the insurance policy obtained by opposite party on behalf of the complainant.
2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the complainant is an agriculturist owing agricultural land who obtained a loan to establish a poultry farm followed by subsequent loans for extension of the farm and erection of the poultry feed mill. The total loan amount was Rs. 3,02,00,000. The complainant states that as required by the bank, the insurance premium in respect of the loan was paid directly to the Insurance Company from the account of the complainant by the opposite party. On account of heavy rain with wind on 6.5.2009, there was extensive da
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.