Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R.K. Agrawal, J
Ajmer Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Charan Singh Chauhan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. failure to issue timely demand does not negate a payment default. (Para 1 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. parties' arguments around payment defaults and deficiencies. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's observation on evidence and deficiencies in service. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. final determination supports the district forum's ruling. (Para 10) |
| 5. order maintained; revision petition confirmed. (Para 11) |
1. The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioners against Respondent as detailed above, under S.21 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 29.11.2018 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as the 'State Commission'), in First Appeal (FA) No. 353 of 2018 in which order dated 8.5.2018 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ajmer (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 23 of 2014 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the judgment dated 29.11.2018 passed by State Commission, in Appeal No. 353/2018 and confirming the judgment dated 8.5.2018 passed by the District Forum, Ajmer in Complaint No. 23/2014.
2. While the Revision Petitioners (hereinafter also referre
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
