State Bank of Bikaner And Jaipur v. Vipin Kumar - 2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 18322

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 18322

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
DR. INDER JIT SINGH (PRESIDING MEMBER)
State Bank of Bikaner And Jaipur v. Vipin Kumar

Table of Content
1. context of revision petition under consumer protection act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding payment responsibilities. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's observation on jurisdiction and errors. (Para 6 , 7)
4. final ruling and dismissal of the petition. (Para 8)

1. The present Revision Petition ( RP) has been filed by the Petitioners against the Respondents, as detailed above, under S.21 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 , against the order dated 12.12.2012 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Punjab (hereinafter referred to as the ˜State Commission') in First Appeal ( FA) No. 27 of 2009 in which order dated 6.11.2008 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Sangrur (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 292 of 2008 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the order dated 12.12.2012 of the State Commission.

2. Petitioners have challenged the said order dated 12.12.2012 of the State Commission inter alia on the following grounds :

(a) Respondent No.3 has not joined the proceedings before the District Forum who was necessary party to the Complaint.
(b) Ashok Kumar who presented the demand draft through Pun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document