Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jasmeet Singh, J
National Highways Authority Of India – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Construction Co Ltd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and factual background of the dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 22) |
| 2. competing claims on contractual rates and measurement methods. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. limited scope of judicial review under section 34. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 4. interpretation of composite work items for fly ash embankments. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. compliance with binding precedent regarding composite measurement. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. validity of tribunal jurisdiction and interest award methodology. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 7. final adjudication dismissing the petition. (Para 40 , 41) |
JUDGMENT
1. This is a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“1996 Act”) seeking to challenge the Arbitral Award dated 22.07.2014 passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal (“Tribunal”) in the matter of “Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. v. M/s. National Highways Authority of India‖.
2. The petitioner (respondent before the Tribunal) is a statutory body constituted under Section 3 of the National Highways Authority of India Act, 1998 , for the purpose of developing, maintaining, and m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
