Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jasmeet Singh, J
SJVN Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Patel Gammon Joint Venture – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the contractual dispute between sjvn ltd and the respondent regarding claim no. 4. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. petitioner challenges the arbitral award based on jurisdiction and specific contractual prohibitions against paying for overbreak haulage. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 3. respondent argues for the validity of the award and maintains that delhi lacks the seat of arbitration due to an exclusive jurisdiction clause. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 4. court reiterates limited scope of interference under sec 34 and affirms the arbitral tribunal's findings on the merits of claim no. 4. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 5. determination that multiple venues in an arbitration agreement do not establish a seat, and an express exclusive jurisdiction clause overrides venue choices. (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68) |
| 6. dismissal of the petition on grounds of lack of jurisdiction and absence of patent illegality. (Para 69 , 70) |
J U D G M E N T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
