Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Saurabh Banerjee, J
Sandeep Dhawan – Appellant
Versus
Amarjeet Singh Kohli – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural context for eviction petitions under section 14(1)(e) of the delhi rent control act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 17) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding title disputes, oral agreements, and bona fide requirement. (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. court's refusal to recognize oral ownership claims contradicting admitted landlord-tenant relationship. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. co-owner's right to seek eviction and validation of landlord's bona fide need for business. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. final adjudication upholding the eviction order and directing surrender of possession. (Para 26 , 27) |
J U D G M E N T
1. Common arguments have been addressed in the above two petitions, which are arising out of a common factual matrix. As such, both the above petitions are being taken up together.
2. The respondent/ landlord, in both the petitions, filed two eviction petitions bearing RC ARC Nos.54/2021 and 53/2021 against the petitioner(s)/ tenant(s) qua the two premises being the middle shop1Hereinafter ‘first subject premises’ and the corner shop2Hereinafter ‘second subject premises’ respectively, on the Ground Floor of property bearing No.H-25
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
