Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Ravinder Dudeja, J
SOHAIL MALIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of fir and prior complaints (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. allegations of stalking and violence (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments for investigation (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. state's defense against petitioner's claims (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. respondents' contention on petitioner's credibility (Para 26 , 27) |
| 6. court's observation on judicial process (Para 28 , 29) |
| 7. criteria for police investigation (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 8. final decision and dismissal of petition (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ,[ BNSS ], 2023 (erstwhile Section 482 of Cr.P.C.), seeking registration of FIR and for setting aside the impugned order dated 24.05.2024, whereby, the learned Sessions Judge was pleased to dismiss the Criminal Revision Petition bearing No. 662/2023 and upheld the order dated 16.08.2023, passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, dismissing, the petitioner’s application under Section 156 (3) of Code of Criminal Procedure[Cr.P.C.] in Complaint Case No. 1128/2023.
Brief facts:
2. Petitioner is an IRS Officer of 2010
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
