Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Navin Chawla, Madhu Jain, JJ
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
MANOJ KUMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disclosure of criminal history in application forms (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. tribunal's reconsideration of earlier decisions (Para 10 , 12) |
| 3. petitioners' arguments against tribunal's order (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. respondent's defense against allegations of concealment (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. court’s analysis of legal precedents (Para 35 , 36 , 38 , 39) |
| 6. standards for judging suitability based on prior conduct (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 7. court's final conclusions on the legitimacy of the order (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
JUDGMENT
MADHU JAIN, J.
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners, challenging the Order dated 05.04.2025 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 327/2016, titled Manoj Kumar v. The Commissioner of Police & Ors., whereby the learned Tribunal allowed the said O.A. filed by the respondent herein.
FACTS OF THE PRESENT CASE
2. To give a brief background of the facts giving rise to the present petition, a recruitment notification dated 30.05.2012 was issued by the Delhi Police, inviting applications to fill 752 vacancies
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
