Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
MR ANUJ GUGLANI – Appellant
Versus
MR HIRALAL C GUGLANI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. genealogy and joint family property context (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. defendant no.2's grounds for application (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. plaintiff's objections to defendant’s claims (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. legal standards for rejecting a plaint (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. final dismissal of the application (Para 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT
I.A. 8202/2025
1. This is an application under Order VII Rule 11(a) & (d) of the CPC filed by Defendant No.2 for rejection of the plaint on the ground that the plaint fails to disclose a cause of action and is barred by law.
2. The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff seeking a decree of partition, rendition of accounts and perpetual injunction against Defendants No.1, 12 and 13 in respect of immoveable property bearing No.F-4/16, Model Town, Delhi-110009 (hereinafter referred to as the ‗Suit Property’), claiming that he is a coparcener in the H.C. Guglani HUF.
3. Before dwelling into the factual background of the case, it is imperative to understand the genealogy of the Guglani family. The Family Tree of the Guglani Family, as given in the Plaint, is as under:
4. The other Defendants are siblings, legal heirs, or descendants of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
