Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J
MR. MOHD. KHALID – Appellant
Versus
M/S JAI MATA DI PACKAGING THROUGH ITS PARTNERS & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. formation and structure of partnership agreement (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. conflict and disputes between partners in a partnership (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. legal notices and petitions for dispute resolution (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. judicial scrutiny under section 11 of the arbitration act (Para 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. legal basis for appointing an arbitrator (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. jurisdictional implications of section 42 of the arbitration act (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. final ruling on the arbitration petition and appointment of arbitrator (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
JUDGMENT
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR J.
1. The present Petition, under Section 11 of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 , Act, has been filed seeking the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator in terms ofClause 15 , Arbitration Clause of thePartnership Deed dated 23.02.2023 , Partnership Deed/Agreement for adjudication of disputes inter se the parties.
2. M/s Jai Mata Di Packaging, Respondent No. 1-Firm, which is Respondent No. 1 herein, is a Partnership Firm, while the Petitioner, along with Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4, are equ
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
