Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, MADHU JAIN, JJ
SATYENDRA DIXIT – Appellant
Versus
UOI & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging orders of disciplinary proceedings (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 2. writ petition challenging tribunal's orders (Para 19 , 20) |
| 3. petitioner's claims and procedural violations (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. respondent's defense and disciplinary proceedings (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 5. judicial review standards in disciplinary matters (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 6. final decision and order of dismissal (Para 60 , 61 , 62) |
JUDGMENT
MADHU JAIN, J.
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the Orders dated 20.07.2005 and 20.01.2006 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 1846/2004 and R.A. No. 175/2005, respectively, whereby the O.A. filed by the petitioner and the subsequent Review Application seeking recall of the Order dated 20.07.2005 were dismissed.
FACTS OF THE CASE:
2. The factual matrix of the case is that the petitioner was working as a Storekeeper with the C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
