$~11

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 3557/2025 and CM APPL. 16611/2025

SHRI CHAND GAUTAM & ANR. .....Petitioners

Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Advocate

along with petitioner in person.

versus

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents

Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Yadav, Ms. Preeti

Gothwal, Advocates for R1.

Mr. Sacchin Puri (Sr. Adv) along with Ms. Mehak Ghaloth, Mr. Akash Gahlot and Mr. Dhan Singh,

Advocates for R-2 and 3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

O R D E R

% 12.01.2026

1. The instant petition has arisen out of the order dated 10.01.2025 passed by the Appellate Authority i.e. Divisional Commissioner under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (the Act of 2007). The impugned order upholds and affirms the view taken by the District Magistrate in order dated 15.04.2024. It is, thus,

seen that there are concurrent findings of fact by two authorities.

2. The petitioners claim to be senior citizens and the owners of property bearing No.D-14, Ground Floor, Pamposh Enclave, New Delhi-110048 (hereinafter referred to as the property in question). Respondent nos. 2 and 3

herein are the son and daughter-in-law of t