Read full ActS.1 Short extent, application and commencement
(1) This Act may be called the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
(2) It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir and it applies also to citizens of India outside India.
(3) It shall come into force in a State on such date as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.
Legal Commentary on Section 1 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007
Introduction
Section 1 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, lays down the preliminary provisions, including the title, extent, and commencement of the Act. It sets the foundation for the entire legislation aimed at ensuring the welfare, maintenance, and protection of senior citizens and parents.
What does Section 1 Say
- Section 1(1): Provides the short title of the Act as "The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007."
- Section 1(2): States that the Act extends to the whole of India.
- Section 1(3): Specifies the commencement date, which is the date on which the Act comes into force in a particular State, as notified by the Government.
Essential Ingredients
- Clear identification of the Act's title.
- Geographical extent of the Act's applicability.
- Date of commencement, which can vary by State through notifications.
- Authority to notify the commencement date.
Scope of Section 1
- Establishes the legal framework for the welfare and maintenance of senior citizens and parents.
- Defines the territorial extent, ensuring nationwide applicability.
- Provides flexibility for States to notify the date of enforcement, allowing phased or region-specific implementation.
- Sets the stage for subsequent provisions that detail rights, duties, and procedures.
Punishment for Section
- Section 1 itself does not prescribe any punishment; it is a procedural and foundational section.
- Punishments related to violations of the Act are specified in other sections, such as penalties for neglect, abandonment, or abuse of senior citizens.
Legal Comments (Bullet Point Summary)
- "Title" - Establishes the name of the Act, providing clarity and legal identity - [Source: "S. NEELAVATHI VS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT COLLECTOR"]
- "Extent" - Confirms the territorial applicability across India, ensuring nationwide coverage - [Source: "Aarshya Gulati (through: Next Friend Mrs. Divya Gulati) VS Government of NCT of Delhi"]
- "Commencement" - Allows the Government to notify the date of enforcement, facilitating phased implementation - [Source: "Aarshya Gulati (through: Next Friend Mrs. Divya Gulati) VS Government of NCT of Delhi"]
- "Authority" - Grants power to the State Government to notify the commencement date, ensuring flexibility - [Source: "Aarshya Gulati (through: Next Friend Mrs. Divya Gulati) VS Government of NCT of Delhi"]
- "Scope" - Sets the legislative framework for welfare and maintenance, defining the Act's reach - [Source: "S. NEELAVATHI VS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT COLLECTOR"]
- "Legal Foundation" - Acts as the constitutional and statutory basis for subsequent provisions - [Source: "Jayashankar VS Assistant Commissioner"]
- "Territorial Application" - Ensures the Act applies uniformly across all states and Union Territories - [Source: "Aarshya Gulati (through: Next Friend Mrs. Divya Gulati) VS Government of NCT of Delhi"]
- "Implementation" - Empowers State Governments to notify enforcement dates, enabling regional adaptation - [Source: "Aarshya Gulati (through: Next Friend Mrs. Divya Gulati) VS Government of NCT of Delhi"]
- "No Punishment" - Section 1 does not prescribe penalties; penalties are detailed in later sections - [Source: "S. NEELAVATHI VS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT COLLECTOR"]
- "Legal Certainty" - Provides clarity on the Act's title and scope, essential for legal interpretation - [Source: "Jayashankar VS Assistant Commissioner"]
- "Framework Establishment" - Lays the groundwork for the creation of tribunals and enforcement mechanisms - [Source: "Aarshya Gulati (through: Next Friend Mrs. Divya Gulati) VS Government of NCT of Delhi"]
- "Legislative Intent" - Demonstrates the intent to protect and promote the welfare of senior citizens nationwide - [Source: "S. NEELAVATHI VS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT COLLECTOR"]
- "Flexibility" - The provision for State-specific commencement dates allows tailored implementation - [Source: "Aarshya Gulati (through: Next Friend Mrs. Divya Gulati) VS Government of NCT of Delhi"]
- "Legal Certainty" - Ensures that the Act's application is well-defined, aiding judicial and administrative clarity - [Source: "Jayashankar VS Assistant Commissioner"]
- "No Direct Punitive Provision" - Reinforces that Section 1 is procedural, with punitive measures elsewhere - [Source: "S. NEELAVATHI VS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT COLLECTOR"]
- "Foundation for Rights" - Serves as the legal foundation for the rights and duties conferred in subsequent sections - [Source: "Jayashankar VS Assistant Commissioner"]
- "Policy Declaration" - Reflects the policy to uphold the dignity and welfare of senior citizens - [Source: "S. NEELAVATHI VS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT COLLECTOR"]
- "Legal Clarity" - Clarifies the scope and application, preventing ambiguity in enforcement - [Source: "Aarshya Gulati (through: Next Friend Mrs. Divya Gulati) VS Government of NCT of Delhi"]
- "Enabling Provision" - Facilitates the operationalization of the Act through notifications and state-level enforcement - [Source: "Aarshya Gulati (through: Next Friend Mrs. Divya Gulati) VS Government of NCT of Delhi"]
- "No Punishment in Section 1" - Emphasizes that penalties are prescribed in other sections, not in the introductory clause - [Source: "S. NEELAVATHI VS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT COLLECTOR"]
Conclusion
Section 1 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, functions as the foundational clause establishing the title, scope, territorial extent, and commencement of the legislation. It provides the necessary legal clarity and flexibility for phased implementation across India. While it does not prescribe punishments, it sets the stage for a comprehensive framework aimed at safeguarding the dignity, rights, and welfare of senior citizens, with subsequent sections detailing enforcement mechanisms, penalties, and procedural safeguards.
Note: This commentary synthesizes legal insights from the provided sources, emphasizing the importance of Section 1 as the legislative foundation for the entire Act.
S.2 Definitions
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,--
(a) "children" includes son, daughter, grandson and grand-daughter but does not include a minor;
(b) "maintenance" includes provision for food, clothing, residence and medical attendance and treatment;
(c) "minor" means a person who, under the provisions of the Majority Act, 1875(9 of 1875), is deemed not to have attained the age of majority;
(d) "parent" means father or mother whether biological, adoptive or step father or step mother, as the case may be, whether or not the father or the mother is a senior citizen;
(e) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made by the State Government under this Act;
(f) "
MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007 – SECTION 2
Introduction
Section 2 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 ("the Act") contains the definitions that form the interpretative backbone of the legislation. These definitions delineate the scope of key terms such as "maintenance," "parent," "senior citizen," "property," "welfare," and "relative," thereby determining who can claim relief, against whom, and for what purposes the Tribunal can exercise its jurisdiction.
What Section 2 Says
Section 2 provides a structured set of definitional clauses (from Section 2(a) onwards) that:- Define "maintenance" to include provision for food, clothing, residence, medical attendance, and treatment.- Define "senior citizen" and "parent" to identify the eligible claimants.- Define "relative" to extend potential liability beyond children to other family members.- Define "property" broadly to include rights or interests in property.- Define "welfare" to encompass measures for the well-being of senior citizens and parents.- Specify the maximum maintenance allowance and associated penalties.
Essential Ingredients
The key ingredients of the definitions in Section 2 are:- Maintenance is not limited to bare subsistence but includes all needs necessary for a dignified life, including emotional support and medical care.- Senior citizen and parent are defined in terms of age and relationship, respectively.- Relative is defined expansively to include individuals who may not have a direct legal obligation but share a familial bond.- Property includes both tangible and intangible rights and interests.- Welfare is interpreted in a broad, benevolent manner consistent with the Act's social welfare objectives.
Scope of Section 2
The scope of Section 2 is foundational to the entire Act. It determines:- The class of persons who can approach the Maintenance Tribunal.- The class of persons against whom maintenance or welfare directions can be issued.- The types of relief available (maintenance, welfare measures, eviction, etc.).- The interpretive framework for the Act, which courts have consistently held should be interpreted in a manner that advances the cause of senior citizens and parents.
Punishment for Section
While Section 2 itself does not prescribe punishment, the Act provides for penalties under other sections (e.g., Section 23) for non-compliance with maintenance orders, which are informed by the definitions in Section 2.
Legal Comments
"Maintenance" definition - The term 'maintenance' under the Act includes provision for food, clothing, residence, medical attendance and treatment, and is not restricted to bare minimum maintenance but includes all needs of the senior citizen so that he may lead a normal life. [Shankar Lal VS State of Rajasthan - 2013 0 Supreme(Raj) 486]
"Maintenance" includes emotional support - The definition of 'maintenance' is broad enough to include emotional support and protection from neglect, reflecting the Act's comprehensive approach to the well-being of senior citizens. [Shankar Lal VS State of Rajasthan - 2013 0 Supreme(Raj) 486]
"Senior citizen" and "parent" as eligible claimants - The Act provides a simple, inexpensive, and speedy system for parents and senior citizens to claim maintenance from their children and relatives, with the definitions in Section 2 determining eligibility. [Shankar Lal VS State of Rajasthan - 2013 0 Supreme(Raj) 486]
"Relative" defined expansively - The definition of 'relative' under the Act extends potential liability beyond children to other family members, and welfare measures can be imposed against any person based on accepted relationship between parties involving mutual obligations for a considerable time, even if such persons may not have a legal obligation to pay maintenance. [Reju VS Maintenance Tribunal - Current Civil Cases (2016)]
"Property" includes rights and interests - Under the Act, 'property' is defined to include "rights or interests in such property," and the expression 'transfer' must receive an interpretation that would advance the beneficent object and purpose of the Act. [Bandra Holy Family Hospital Societ vs State of Maharashtra - 2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 1548]
"Welfare" interpreted broadly - The Act is a social welfare legislation intended to take care of the socio-economic needs of senior citizens and parents, and the term 'welfare' should be interpreted in a manner that advances and promotes their cause. [Ranajit Gopal Roy VS State of West Bengal - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 66]
Interpretation principle - The Act should be interpreted in a manner that advances and promotes the cause of senior citizens and parents, consistent with its social welfare objectives. [Ranajit Gopal Roy VS State of West Bengal - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 66]
Tribunal's jurisdiction to provide welfare measures - The Tribunal can impose welfare measures against any person whom it deems fit in circumstances and for sufficient reasons, even if such persons would not come within the ambit of children or relative as defined under the Act, provided there is an accepted relationship involving mutual obligations. [Reju VS Maintenance Tribunal - Current Civil Cases (2016)]
Welfare measures vs. maintenance - A direction to provide welfare measures is distinct from a direction to pay maintenance, and welfare measures can be imposed against any person based on accepted relationship between parties, even if such persons may not have legal obligation to pay maintenance. [Reju VS Maintenance Tribunal - Current Civil Cases (2016)]
Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to issue injunctions - The Maintenance Tribunal's powers are limited to maintenance orders and do not extend to issuing injunctions, which are not provided for under the Act, and individuals who do not qualify as 'relatives' under the Act cannot be restrained by the Tribunal. [Balamukundan. P VS Damodaran Nair, S/O. The Late Krishna Panickar - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 1522]
Maintenance obligation extends to needs for dignified life - The obligation of children to maintain a parent extends to such needs of the parent as are necessary for him to lead a life of dignity, consistent with the broad definition of 'maintenance' in Section 2. [Shankar Lal VS State of Rajasthan - 2013 0 Supreme(Raj) 486]
Right to residence under the Act - The Act provides for the right to residence of senior citizens and parents, and the Tribunal can direct reinstatement in the family residence as part of maintenance and welfare directions. [Ranajit Gopal Roy VS State of West Bengal - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 66]
"Parent" includes step-parents - The definition of 'parent' under the Act encompasses step-parents, and a stepmother who is a senior citizen is entitled to reside in the disputed premises and seek eviction of petitioners who make her living miserable. [Mayur Vaijanath Tawde VS State Of Maharashtra - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 941]
Maximum maintenance allowance - The maximum maintenance allowance under the Act shall not exceed Rs. 10,000 per month, and non-compliance may result in imprisonment or fine.
Time-bound disposal - An application filed under the Act for monthly allowance for maintenance shall be disposed of within ninety days, reflecting the Act's emphasis on speedy resolution.
Inclusion of daughter-in-law and son-in-law - The definition of "children" in Section 2 has been interpreted to include daughter-in-law and son-in-law to enable their accountability for the care of senior citizens.
Simple, speedy and inexpensive mechanism - The Act provides a simple, speedy and inexpensive mechanism for parents and senior citizens to claim monthly maintenance from their children or relatives, with the definitions in Section 2 forming the basis for such claims.
Legal obligation for children and heirs - The Act makes it a legal obligation for children and heirs to provide maintenance to senior citizens and parents by monthly allowance, and the definitions in Section 2 determine the scope of this obligation.
Safeguarding rights, dignity, and well-being - The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 safeguards the rights, dignity, and well-being of elderly citizens, with Section 2 providing the foundational definitions for its implementation.
S.3 Act to have overriding effect
The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any enactment other than this Act, or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any enactment other than this Act.
Legal Comments
"Section 3 (Overriding effect)" - The Act’s non-obstante clause places MWPSC Act above conflicting provisions in other enactments, guiding welfare-driven adjudication and harmonization with DV Act where relevant. [Sources: "T. Vimalanathan VS District Collector, Tiruvannamalai - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2255", "Satyendra Kumar Singh VS State of U. P. - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 2039", "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)"]
"Essential scope" - Section 3, 4, 5 collectively establish maintenance, residence, and welfare for senior citizens/parents, with Tribunal powers to secure maintenance and, where needed, eviction to protect welfare. [Sources: "Hemant Gamanlal Mehta VS State of Maharashtra - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1715", "Shadab Khairi VS State - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 250", "Savita Avinash Khamkar vs Jyotiram Marutirao Khamkar - 2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 2036"]
"Prevalence of eviction power" - Maintenance Tribunals can order eviction of family members to secure welfare of a senior citizen, but such orders must be balanced with other rights (e.g., DV Act rights in shared households). [Sources: "Hemant Gamanlal Mehta VS State of Maharashtra - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1715", "Lataben W/o Vyomeshbhai Makwana and D/o Pravinbhai Parmar VS Mohanlal Maganlal Makwana - Current Civil Cases (2023)", "Ritika Prashant Jasani VS Anjana Niranjan Jasani - Crimes (2021)"]
"Overriding harmony with DV Act" - In conflicts between MWPSC Act evictions and DV Act rights to a shared household, courts advocate harmonious construction rather than outright override; eviction cannot extinguish DV rights. [Sources: "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)", "Ritika Prashant Jasani VS Anjana Niranjan Jasani - Crimes (2021)", "Savita Avinash Khamkar vs Jyotiram Marutirao Khamkar - 2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 2036"]
"Right to maintenance and residence" - Act imposes a statutory duty on children to maintain parents, extending to residence and basic amenities; denial of maintenance or neglect can trigger Section 23 remedies. [Sources: "T. Vimalanathan VS District Collector, Tiruvannamalai - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2255", "Sheetal Devang Shah VS Presiding Officer Of The Maintenance And ) Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1496", "Satyendra Kumar Singh VS State of U. P. - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 2039"]
"Section 23 – transfer of property void for neglect" - If a senior citizen transfers property with a condition of care and the transferee fails to provide basic amenities, such transfer can be voided as fraud/undue influence; remedies include cancellation. [Sources: "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)", "Sandeep Gulati VS Divisional Commissioner, Office of The Secreatry-Cum-Divisional Commissioner, Department Of Revenue, Govt. of Nct of Delhi - 2020 0 Supreme(Del) 324", "Court on Its Own Motion VS State of Himachal Pradesh - 2015 0 Supreme(HP) 560"]
"Section 23 – gift deed scrutiny" - Gift deeds voidable under Section 23 if the transferee refuses to provide basic amenities; courts scrutinize surrounding circumstances rather than formal labels. [Sources: "Court on Its Own Motion VS State of Himachal Pradesh - 2015 0 Supreme(HP) 560", "Sheetal Devang Shah VS Presiding Officer Of The Maintenance And ) Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1496", "MAHESH SYAL VS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 323"]
"Section 24 – abandonment not always prosecutable" - Courts have held that transporting a senior citizen or not providing maintenance does not automatically constitute abandonment; Section 24 prosecutions require careful factual fit. [Sources: "Pramod John, S/o. M. R. Mani VS State Of Kerala, Represented By Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 637", "Beena Thakur W/o Ravi Prakash Singh VS State of Chhattisgarh - 2023 0 Supreme(Chh) 207"]
"Section 21/Rule framework (Delhi/Bihar variants)" - Rules under Delhi/Bihar variants allocate maintenance evictions and life-protection duties to local tribunals, with appellate avenues and clear procedural guidelines to avoid misuse. [Sources: "Rakhi Sharma VS State - 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 1928", "Shadab Khairi VS State - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 250", "Rambilash Gupta VS State of Bihar - 2023 0 Supreme(Pat) 216"]
"Premature/untimely evictions—remedial relief" - Where eviction is premature or unjust, courts direct restoration of possession and order inquiries into eviction procedures to ensure due process. [Sources: "Pooja Mehta VS Government of NCT of Delhi - 2020 0 Supreme(Del) 1010", "Shadab Khairi VS State - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 250"]
"Shared household concept and DV Act integration" - Court rulings emphasize that a shared household under DV Act includes residence in which the aggrieved person lived, regardless of title, and that MWPSC’s broad protections should harmonize with DV protections. [Sources: "Jagdeepbhai Chandulal Patel VS Reshma Ruchin Patel - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 262", "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)", "Ritika Prashant Jasani VS Anjana Niranjan Jasani - Crimes (2021)"]
"Maintenance Tribunal jurisdiction limits" - Tribunals have explicit jurisdiction to decide on maintenance and related welfare matters, including eviction in certain scenarios, but not to decide civil partition disputes or purely private ownership questions. [Sources: "Rakhi Sharma VS State - 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 1928", "Akhilesh Kumar VS State of UP - 2019 0 Supreme(All) 509", "Jaiprakash Tiwari VS State of U. P. - 2021 0 Supreme(All) 391"]
"Welfare-centric approach" - The Act is welfare-centric: courts interpret sections to ensure basic amenities, health care, and shelter; neglect or abuse triggers protective measures, not punitive isolation. [Sources: "Court on Its Own Motion VS State of Himachal Pradesh - 2015 0 Supreme(HP) 560", "S. NEELAVATHI VS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT COLLECTOR - 2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 4270", "Hemant Gamanlal Mehta VS State of Maharashtra - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1715"]
"Overriding protection for elderly in property transfers" - When transfers occur post-retirement or to secure care, Section 23’s protective regime can override inconsistent transfers, to safeguard welfare and care obligations. [Sources: "T. Vimalanathan VS District Collector, Tiruvannamalai - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2255", "Sandeep Gulati VS Divisional Commissioner, Office of The Secreatry-Cum-Divisional Commissioner, Department Of Revenue, Govt. of Nct of Delhi - 2020 0 Supreme(Del) 324", "Parkash Singh VS Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sangrur-cum-Maintenance Tribunal - 2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 868"]
"Role of other statutes in welfare cases" - Courts insist on harmonization with other welfare statutes (DV Act, CPWD Act, etc.) to avoid undermining protections for women and elderly; the MWPSC Act does not nullify other rights. [Sources: "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)", "Savita Avinash Khamkar vs Jyotiram Marutirao Khamkar - 2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 2036", "Jagdeepbhai Chandulal Patel VS Reshma Ruchin Patel - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 262"]
"Remedies and appeal avenues" - Where orders affect maintenance or eviction, parties can pursue appeals before Appellate Authorities, Divisional Commissioners, or Civil Courts where applicable, preserving rights to challenge Tribunal decisions. [Sources: "Rakhi Sharma VS State - 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 1928", "Akhilesh Kumar VS State of UP - 2019 0 Supreme(All) 509", "Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd VS S. Veerapandi - 2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 3185"]
"Judicial oversight and safeguarding against misuse" - Higher courts monitor Tribunal orders to prevent misuse of the MWPSC Act for eviction or punitive purposes, ensuring due process and proportional relief. [Sources: "Savita Avinash Khamkar vs Jyotiram Marutirao Khamkar - 2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 2036", "Shadab Khairi VS State - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 250", "Suresh Sharma VS Dhanwanti Sharma - 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 347"]
"Medical and welfare entitlements" - Courts recognize the Act’s alignment with health and welfare needs, including potential medical reimbursements for dependent parents under broader schemes, interpreting "family" and "maintenance" purposively. [Sources: "Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd VS S. Veerapandi - 2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 3185", "S. NEELAVATHI VS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT COLLECTOR - 2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 4270"]
"Penalty regime (Section 9/Section 23 interplay)" - The Act caps maintenance amounts (e.g., Rs 10,000 per month in some contexts) but allows higher relief where warranted by welfare needs; jurisdictions vary by state, requiring factual calibration. [Sources: "Hemant Gamanlal Mehta VS State of Maharashtra - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1715", "Suresh VS State of Kerala - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 167", "Biplab Ganguly VS Biswanath Ganguly - 2022 0 Supreme(Cal) 1293"]
"Non-obstante clause as policy tool" - The non-obstante provision supports welfare policy over technical title-based objections; but courts stress harmonious implementation with existing protective statutes. [Sources: "T. Vimalanathan VS District Collector, Tiruvannamalai - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2255", "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)"]
"Eviction orders in parental abuse cases" - Tribunals can order eviction in cases of parental abuse to protect the elder, subject to proper proceedings and safeguards. [Sources: "Shadab Khairi VS State - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 250", "Mayur Vaijanath Tawde VS State Of Maharashtra - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 941"]
"Public welfare orientation" - The MWPSC Act’s core objective is public welfare for seniors, not merely private dispute resolution; this informs approach to both maintenance and possession. [Sources: "" (general description in multiple sources), "Suryakant Kisan Pawar VS Deputy Collector, Mumbai and Presiding Officer Parents and Senior Citizens Subsistence Tribunal, Mumbai - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 383"]
"Judicial caution on piecemeal litigation" - Courts discourage raising discrete questions in separate petitions; parties should present all material facts, ensuring coherent adjudication. [Sources: "Talatam Nageswara Rao, S/o. Talatam Veeranna vs Union Of India, Represented By Its Pri.Secretary, Financial Services Department - 2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9414"]
"Consequences for non-compliance" - Tribunals can impose warrants, attachment, or imprisonment for failure to pay maintenance, with enforcement measures described under Civil Procedure/CrPC integration. [Sources: "Suresh VS State of Kerala - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 167", "Abdul Kader Mohammed Iqbal VS District Collector Malappuram - 2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 477"]
"Notification and dissemination of remedies" - Courts direct tribunals to inform litigants clearly about available remedies and appeals to reduce confusion over multiple forums. [Sources: "Rakhi Sharma VS State - 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 1928"]
"Key practical takeaway" - Section 3’s overriding welfare aim should harmonize with other protective statutes, ensuring elderly care while protecting the rights of women in shared households. [Sources: "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)", "Ritika Prashant Jasani VS Anjana Niranjan Jasani - Crimes (2021)", "Jagdeepbhai Chandulal Patel VS Reshma Ruchin Patel - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 262"]
S.4 Maintenance of parents and senior citizens
(1) A senior citizen including parent who is unable to maintain himself from his own earning or out of the property owned by him, shall be entitled to make an application under section 5 in case of--
(i) parent or grand-parent, against one or more of his children not being a minor;
(ii) a childless senior citizen, against such of his relative referred to in clause (g) of section 2.
(2) The obligation of the children or relative, as the case may be, to maintain a senior citizen extends to the needs of such citizen so that senior citizen may lead a normal life.
(3) The obligation of the children to maintain his or her parent extends to the needs of such parent either father or mother or both, as the case may be, so that such parent may lead a normal l
Legal Commentary on Section 4 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007
Introduction
Section 4 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereafter "the Act") establishes the legal right of senior citizens and parents to claim maintenance if they are unable to support themselves from their own earnings or property. The section aims to protect the dignity, well-being, and financial security of elderly persons, especially in the context of declining joint family systems.
What does Section 4 Say?
Section 4 provides that:- A senior citizen or parent who cannot maintain himself/herself from his/her own earnings or property can apply for maintenance.- The application can be made against children, relatives, or any other person having sufficient means.- Maintenance includes provisions for food, clothing, residence, medical attendance, and treatment.- The section emphasizes the obligation of children and relatives to provide support to elderly parents or senior citizens, ensuring they lead a life of dignity.
Essential Ingredients
- Inability to maintain oneself: The senior citizen/parent must prove incapacity to sustain basic needs from their own earnings or property.
- Existence of sufficient means: The respondent (child/relative) must have sufficient income or property to support the applicant.
- Application by the senior citizen/parent: The right is exercisable through a formal application under the Act.
- Scope of maintenance: Encompasses food, clothing, residence, medical care, and other needs to lead a dignified life.
- Legal obligation of children/relatives: The section imposes a statutory duty on children and relatives to provide maintenance.
Scope of Section 4
- Protection of elderly rights: Ensures that senior citizens are not left destitute or dependent on others.
- Civil remedy: Provides a speedy, inexpensive process for claiming maintenance, avoiding lengthy criminal or civil litigation.
- Applicability to property: Extends to cases where the respondent has possession of property or income that can support the applicant.
- Support for vulnerable groups: Particularly relevant where joint family systems have eroded, and elderly persons face neglect or abandonment.
- Complementary provisions: Works in conjunction with other sections (e.g., Sections 5, 6, 7) to enforce maintenance orders and address eviction issues.
Punishment for Non-compliance
- Penalties: Under Section 23 of the Act, failure to comply with maintenance orders can attract penalties, including fines and imprisonment (typically up to three months or Rs. 10,000, or both) [Source: ""].
- Enforcement: Orders for maintenance can be enforced through revenue recovery proceedings, and non-compliance may lead to arrest or detention.
- Criminal proceedings: The Act also makes offences like harassment or abuse punishable, with cognizable and bailable offences tried summarily [Source: "Sriram Yashwanth, S/o. S. Venkatesh VS State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad"].
- Abuse of process: Filing false claims or misusing the provisions can be challenged in courts, and proceedings can be quashed if found to be malicious or frivolous [Source: "M. P. Tej Babu VS State of Telangana"].
Legal Comments (Bullet Point Summary)
- "Protective framework" - Section 4 creates a statutory right for elderly parents to claim maintenance, emphasizing social justice for vulnerable seniors [Source: ""].
- "Incapacity requirement" - The applicant must prove inability to maintain oneself from earnings or property; mere possession of property does not automatically entitle to maintenance [Source: "Janardhanan VS Maintenance Tribunal Appellate Authority and District Collector"].
- "Sufficient means" - The respondent’s income or property must be sufficient to support the applicant; possession of property alone is not enough unless it generates income [Source: "Janardhanan VS Maintenance Tribunal Appellate Authority and District Collector"].
- "Broad scope of maintenance" - Includes food, clothing, residence, medical aid, and other essentials, ensuring holistic support for elderly persons [Source: "Shankar Lal VS State of Rajasthan"].
- "Legal obligation of children" - The Act imposes a statutory duty on children and relatives to support aged parents, reflecting societal moral values [Source: "Sindhu B. W/o Jayakumar VS V. Balachandran S/o Late Shri Velayudhan"].
- "Speedy and inexpensive remedy" - The Act provides for summary proceedings before tribunals, facilitating quick enforcement of maintenance orders [Source: "Shankar Lal VS State of Rajasthan"].
- "Enforcement mechanisms" - Orders can be enforced via revenue recovery and, if necessary, through criminal penalties, including imprisonment and fines [Source: "Sriram Yashwanth, S/o. S. Venkatesh VS State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad"].
- "Property transfer and eviction" - Tribunal can declare transfer of property to be void if it is made with the intent to deprive the senior citizen of maintenance, and can order eviction of unauthorized occupants [Source: "Nayana Sudhir Shah VS Sudhir Premji Shah"].
- "Sufficient means and possession" - The respondent must have sufficient income or property in possession, but mere ownership without income is insufficient for maintenance claims [Source: "Jayantram Vallabhdas Meswania VS Vallabhdas Govindram Meswania"]].
- "Harmonious interpretation" - When interpreting the Act, courts must balance the rights of senior citizens with other laws such as the Domestic Violence Act, ensuring no conflict or deprivation of rights [Source: "Ritika Prashant Jasani VS Anjana Niranjan Jasani"].
- "Property rights and maintenance" - The Act recognizes that possession of property with income supports maintenance; transfer of property to deprive support can be declared void [Source: "Nayana Sudhir Shah VS Sudhir Premji Shah"].
- "Application process" - Senior citizens or parents can file applications in the district where they reside or where the respondent’s income/property is located [Source: "01100061175"].
- "Jurisdiction of tribunals" - Maintenance tribunals have exclusive jurisdiction to decide maintenance and eviction issues, with appellate remedies available under Section 16 [Source: "Bhupendra Singh S/o. Late Shri Laxman Singh Chundawat VS Ramkanwar W/o. Late Shri Laxman Singh Chundawat"].
- "No requirement of prior maintenance order" - Eviction or transfer of property can be ordered even without prior maintenance order if the respondent has sufficient means and the applicant cannot maintain themselves [Source: "SHADAB KHAIRI VS STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)"].
- "Protection from harassment" - The Act also criminalizes harassment and abuse of senior citizens, with penalties and remedies available for victims [Source: "Silva VS Francis"].
- "Legal aid and representation" - Advocates and legal practitioners have a right to represent parties before tribunals, ensuring fair proceedings [Source: "Adv. K. G. Suresh S/o. K. V. Gopalan VS Union Of India, Ministry For Law And Social Welfare, Represented By Secretary, Rashtrapati Bhavan, New Delhi"].
- "Harmonizing laws" - Courts are required to interpret the Act harmoniously with other laws like the Domestic Violence Act, ensuring rights in shared households are protected [Source: "Jessie Mary Fernandes VS State Of Karnataka By Its Principal Secretary Home Department"].
- "Civil remedies and criminal sanctions" - The Act provides both civil remedies (maintenance, eviction) and criminal sanctions for offences like abuse, harassment, or transfer of property to defeat maintenance claims [Source: "Sriram Yashwanth, S/o. S. Venkatesh VS State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad"].
Final Remarks
Section 4 of the Act solidifies the legal obligation of children and relatives to support elderly parents and senior citizens, with comprehensive provisions for maintenance, enforcement, and protection of property rights. Courts and tribunals are empowered to ensure swift justice, prevent abuse or deprivation, and uphold the dignity of senior citizens in accordance with constitutional principles and social justice objectives.
S.5 Application for maintenance
(1) An application for maintenance under section 4, may be made--
(a) by a senior citizen or a parent, as the case may be; or
(b) if he is incapable, by any other person or organisation authorised by him; or
(c) the Tribunal may take cognizance suo motu.
Explanation.-- For the purposes of this section "organisation" means any voluntary association registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860(21 of 1960), or any other law for the time being in force.
(2) The Tribunal may, during the pendency of the proceeding regarding monthly, allowance for the maintenance under this section, order such children or relative to make a monthly allowance for the interim maintenance of such senior citizen including p
Legal Commentary on Section 5 of The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007
Introduction
Section 5 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, establishes the procedure for senior citizens or parents to apply for maintenance when they are unable to support themselves. It provides a legal framework for ensuring the welfare of elderly persons, emphasizing their right to claim maintenance from children or relatives who have the means to support them. This section is central to the Act’s objective of safeguarding the dignity, health, and financial security of senior citizens.
What does Section 5 Say?
- Application for Maintenance: Any senior citizen or parent, unable to maintain themselves from their own earnings or property, can file an application for maintenance before the designated Tribunal.
- Filing Authority: The application can be filed by the senior citizen/parent themselves or, if incapable, by any other person authorized by them.
- Jurisdiction: The Tribunal has the authority to entertain such applications in the district where the applicant resides or last resided, or where the respondent (child or relative) resides or last resided.
- Suo motu Cognizance: The Tribunal can also take suo motu notice of cases, i.e., initiate proceedings on its own based on credible information or reports.
- Scope of Relief: The Tribunal can order maintenance including food, clothing, residence, and medical care, and may also pass orders for protection of property and welfare.
Essential Ingredients
- Inability to self-maintain: The applicant must prove that they cannot support themselves through their own earnings or property.
- Responsibility of children/relatives: The respondent must have sufficient means and be in a position to provide maintenance.
- Jurisdictional competence: The application must be filed within the appropriate district where the applicant or respondent resides/last resided.
- Suo motu power: The Tribunal’s authority to initiate proceedings independently based on credible reports or sources.
- Relief scope: Orders for maintenance, medical aid, and protection of property.
Scope of Section 5
- Broad coverage: Encompasses all senior citizens or parents unable to support themselves, regardless of whether they are in government or private property.
- Applicability to relatives: Extends to relatives who have sufficient means, emphasizing familial responsibility.
- Procedural flexibility: Allows applications to be filed by authorized persons if the senior citizen is incapable of doing so.
- Enforcement mechanisms: The Tribunal can enforce its orders through various means, including attachment of property or other coercive measures.
- Suo motu cognizance: Recognizes the importance of proactive intervention by the Tribunal to prevent neglect or abuse.
Punishment for Violations
While Section 5 itself primarily deals with the application process and orders for maintenance, violations of maintenance orders or neglecting senior citizens can attract penalties under other provisions of the Act, including imprisonment or fines, especially if the responsible person refuses or neglects to comply with the Tribunal’s orders.
Legal Comments
- "Application for Maintenance" - Section 5 empowers senior citizens or parents to initiate proceedings for maintenance if they cannot support themselves, facilitating access to justice for vulnerable elderly persons - [Sources: Sections 5, 15, 23].
- "Suo motu Cognizance" - The Tribunal has the authority to initiate suo motu proceedings based on credible reports, ensuring proactive protection of senior citizens' welfare - [Sources: Section 5, 23].
- "Jurisdiction" - The application can be filed in the district where the applicant or respondent last resided, ensuring territorial competence; jurisdiction is broad to cover various residence scenarios - [Sources: Section 5, 23].
- "Scope of Relief" - Orders can include maintenance, medical aid, and protection of property, aligning with the Act’s holistic approach to elderly welfare - [Sources: Sections 4, 5].
- "Inability to Support Self" - The applicant must demonstrate incapacity to support themselves from earnings or property, emphasizing the need for genuine proof of need - [Sources: Section 5, 15].
- "Responsibility of Sufficient Means" - The respondent must have sufficient means and be in a position to provide maintenance, establishing familial duty and financial capability - [Sources: Section 5, 23].
- "Application by Authorized Persons" - If the senior citizen is incapable, a relative or authorized person can file the application, ensuring accessibility for all elders - [Sources: Section 5, 15].
- "Enforcement of Orders" - The Tribunal can enforce maintenance orders through attachment or coercive measures, ensuring compliance and protection of elderly rights - [Sources: Sections 5, 8].
- "Proactive Proceedings" - The Tribunal’s suo motu powers facilitate early intervention, preventing neglect and abuse of senior citizens - [Sources: Section 5].
- "Procedural Flexibility" - The process allows for affidavits and simplified procedures, making access to justice more accessible for the elderly - [Sources: Sections 5, 15].
- "Protection of Property" - Orders may include protection of the property of senior citizens, preventing illegal dispossession or neglect - [Sources: Sections 23, 24].
- "Legal Obligation of Children and Relatives" - The Act makes it a legal obligation for family members with sufficient means to maintain senior citizens, reinforcing familial duties - [Sources: Sections 4, 5].
- "Suo motu Proceedings" - The Tribunal’s power to act without a formal application ensures timely intervention in cases of neglect or abuse - [Sources: Section 5].
- "Relief Scope" - The scope includes not only monetary maintenance but also medical and welfare support, aligning with the Act’s comprehensive approach - [Sources: Sections 4, 5].
- "Territorial Jurisdiction" - The application can be filed in the district where either party resides or last resided, ensuring wide territorial coverage - [Sources: Section 5].
- "Application by Incapacitated Senior Citizens" - The provision allows for authorized persons to act on behalf of senior citizens, ensuring protection even when they are incapacitated - [Sources: Section 5].
- "Enforcement and Compliance" - The Act provides mechanisms for enforcement, including attachment of property and coercive measures, to ensure compliance with orders - [Sources: Sections 5, 8].
- "Holistic Welfare" - The section supports the broader objective of the Act to ensure the dignity, health, and welfare of senior citizens through accessible legal remedies - [Sources: Sections 4, 5].
Note: The interpretation of Section 5 is reinforced by judicial pronouncements emphasizing the importance of providing a simplified, accessible, and proactive legal mechanism for the welfare of elderly persons, aligning with the constitutional mandate of dignity and right to life under Article 21.
S.6 Jurisdiction and procedure
(1) The proceedings under section 5 may be taken against any children or relative in any district--
(a) where he resides or last resided; or
(b) where children or relative resides.
(2) On receipt of the application under section 5, the Tribunal shall issue a process for procuring the presence of children or relative against whom the application is filed.
(3) For securing the attendance of children or relative the Tribunal shall have the power of a Judicial Magistrate of first class as provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(2 of 1974).
(4) All evidence to such proceedings shall be taken in the presence of the children or relative against whom an order for payment of maintenance is proposed to
Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 – Section 6
Introduction
Section 6 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 ("the Act") is a pivotal provision that delineates the jurisdiction and procedure for maintenance claims. It operationalizes the Act's primary objective of providing a simple, inexpensive, and speedy remedy to parents and senior citizens in distress, ensuring they can claim maintenance from children or relatives without navigating cumbersome traditional legal processes.
What Section 6 Says
Section 6 establishes the framework for maintenance proceedings by:- Defining the territorial jurisdiction of the Maintenance Tribunal- Outlining the procedure for filing and adjudicating maintenance applications- Specifying the parties against whom proceedings can be initiated- Providing the legal basis for the Tribunal's authority
The section ensures that maintenance claims can be addressed efficiently, with the Tribunal having the power to secure attendance of parties and adjudicate disputes.
Essential Ingredients
The essential elements of Section 6 include:1. Jurisdiction: The Maintenance Tribunal has authority to hear maintenance applications.2. Territorial Scope: Proceedings can be initiated in any District where the senior citizen or parent resides or where the children/relatives reside.3. Parties: Proceedings can be taken against any children or relatives.4. Procedure: The Tribunal follows a summary procedure as deemed fit and proper.5. Attendance: The Tribunal has powers to secure the attendance of parties for adjudication.
Scope of Section 6
The scope of Section 6 is comprehensive, covering:- Who can apply: Senior citizens or parents who are unable to maintain themselves.- Against whom: Any children or relatives who inherit property or are legally obligated to provide maintenance.- Where: Any District where the applicant or the respondent resides or last resided.- Purpose: To provide a swift and accessible mechanism for resolving maintenance disputes and securing the welfare of elderly individuals.
Punishment for Section 6
While Section 6 itself primarily deals with jurisdiction and procedure, the Act provides for penalties under other sections (e.g., Section 8) for non-compliance with maintenance orders, including imprisonment and fines. The Tribunal under Section 6(3) also has limited powers to issue warrants for securing attendance.
Legal Comments
- "Jurisdiction and Procedure" - Section 6 lays down the jurisdiction and procedure to be followed by the Maintenance Tribunal, enabling applications for maintenance to be filed by senior citizens or parents against children or relatives in any District where they reside or last resided. - [H. S. Subramanya VS H. S. Lakshmi - 2014 0 Supreme(Kar) 514]
- "Summary Procedure" - The Tribunal has the authority to follow a summary procedure, which implies a short and quick process instead of elaborate legal proceedings, ensuring expedient disposal of maintenance cases. - [H. S. Subramanya VS H. S. Lakshmi - 2014 0 Supreme(Kar) 514]
- "Attendance of Parties" - The powers vested under Section 6(3) are limited to securing the attendance of parties for adjudication of maintenance, and the Tribunal cannot issue warrants beyond this scope. - [Suresh VS State of Kerala - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 167]
- "Objective of the Act" - The primary object of the Act is to provide social justice to parents and senior citizens by compelling those who can support them to do so, rather than punishing neglect. - [H. S. Subramanya VS H. S. Lakshmi - 2014 0 Supreme(Kar) 514]
- "Welfare and Protection" - The Act aims to protect the life and property of senior citizens, making it a legal obligation for children and heirs to provide maintenance. -
- "No Civil Court Jurisdiction" - No Civil Court has jurisdiction in matters covered by this Act, and no injunction can be granted by any Civil Court, reinforcing the exclusive role of the Maintenance Tribunal. -
- "Simple and Speedy Remedy" - The Act provides a simple, inexpensive, and speedy remedy to parents and senior citizens, addressing the decline in the joint family system and emotional neglect faced by the elderly. - [H. S. Subramanya VS H. S. Lakshmi - 2014 0 Supreme(Kar) 514]
- "Maintenance Tribunal's Role" - The Maintenance Tribunal, constituted under the Act, is empowered to direct monthly allowances for the sustenance of elderly parents who are unable to maintain themselves. - [H. S. Subramanya VS H. S. Lakshmi - 2014 0 Supreme(Kar) 514]
- "Landmark Case on Maintenance" - The judiciary has emphasized the Act's role in providing relief from neglect, with magistrates having the authority to order monthly allowances in cases of abandonment or neglect. -
- "Timely Adjudication" - The courts have stressed the importance of timely resolution of appeals under the Act, directing Appellate Tribunals to decide maintenance appeals within prescribed timeframes. - [Kamla Devi vs State of Uttarakhand - 2024 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3509]
- "Eviction and Maintenance" - The Act provides a procedural framework for eviction orders against senior citizens, emphasizing the need for proper application of statutory provisions before passing such orders. - [Pryanka Dhotre VS Andaman And Nicobar Administration - 2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 713]
- "Wide Definition of 'Property'" - The Act encompasses a wide definition of 'property', ensuring that maintenance obligations extend to all assets and resources of the senior citizen or parent. - [Sunny Kumar VS State of Punjab - 2015 0 Supreme(P&H) 2267]
- "Overriding Effect" - The Act has an overriding effect on other enactments, ensuring that maintenance rights under this Act take precedence over conflicting laws. - [Sunny Kumar VS State of Punjab - 2015 0 Supreme(P&H) 2267]
- "State Government Rules" - The Act mandates the State Government to make rules for its implementation, ensuring uniformity and effective enforcement of maintenance provisions across jurisdictions. - [Sunny Kumar VS State of Punjab - 2015 0 Supreme(P&H) 2267]
- "Protection of Life and Property" - The Act makes specific provisions for the protection of the life and property of senior citizens, addressing the vulnerabilities faced by the elderly in the absence of a joint family system. - [H. S. Subramanya VS H. S. Lakshmi - 2014 0 Supreme(Kar) 514]
- "Legal Obligation to Maintain" - The Act creates a legal obligation for children and heirs to provide maintenance to senior citizens and parents, enforceable through the Maintenance Tribunal. -
- "Penalty for Non-Compliance" - Non-compliance with maintenance orders can result in imprisonment, fines, or both, ensuring that the Tribunal's directives are taken seriously. -
- "Right to Dignified Life" - The Act guarantees the right of senior citizens to lead a life of dignity, with maintenance claims being a tool to secure this fundamental right. -
- "Applicability to All India" - The Act extends to the whole of India (except Jammu and Kashmir) and applies to Indian citizens outside the country, ensuring nationwide protection for parents and senior citizens. -
- "Interim Relief" - The Act mandates time-bound resolution of complaints with the possibility of securing interim relief, ensuring that elderly individuals do not suffer prolonged hardship during litigation. -
S.7 Constitution of Maintenance Tribunal
(1) The State Government shall within a period of six months from the date of the commencement of this Act, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute for each Sub-division one or more Tribunals as may be specified in the notification for the purpose of adjudicating and deciding upon the order for maintenance under section 5.
(2) The Tribunal shall be presided over by an officer not below the rank of Sub-Divisional Officer of a State.
(3) Where two or more Tribunals are constituted for any area, the State Government may, by general or special order, regulate the distribution of business among them.
S.8 Summary procedure in case of inquiry
(1) In holding any inquiry under section 5, the Tribunal may, subject to any rules that may be prescribed by the State Government in this behalf, follow such summary procedure as it deems fit.
(2) The Tribunal shall have all the powers of a Civil Court for the purpose of taking evidence on oath and of enforcing the attendance of witnesses and of compelling the discovery and production of documents and material objects and for such other purposes as may be prescribed; and the Tribunal shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for all the purposes of section 195 and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
(3) Subject to any rule that may be made in this behalf, the Tribunal may, for the purpose of adjudicating and deciding upon any claim for maintenance, choose one or more persons possessing special knowledge of any matter relevant
S.9 Order of maintence
(1) If children or relatives, as the case may be, neglect or refuse to maintain a senior citizen being unable to maintain himself, the Tribunal may, on being satisfied of such neglect or refusal, order such children or relatives to make a monthly allowance at such monthly rate for the maintenance of such senior citizen, as the Tribunal may deem fit and to pay the same to such senior citizen as the Tribunal may, from time to time, direct.
(2) The maximum maintenance allowance which may be ordered by such Tribunal shall be such as may be prescribed by the State Government which shall not exceed ten thousand rupees per month.
Section 9 of The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007
Introduction
Section 9 of The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 is the core provision that operationalizes the Act's primary objective—ensuring financial security and welfare for senior citizens and parents who are unable to maintain themselves. The section establishes a mechanism for the Maintenance Tribunal to order children or relatives to provide monthly maintenance allowances to senior citizens in need [Ashok Kumar Joshi S/o Achlaram Bhargava Joshi VS Achlaram Bhargava Joshi S/o Late Mancharam Bhargava - Current Civil Cases (2023)].
What Does Section Say
Section 9 deals with the "Order for maintenance." It provides that if children or relatives, as the case may be, neglect or refuse to maintain a senior citizen who is unable to maintain himself or herself from his own earnings or from the property owned by him, the Tribunal may, on being satisfied of such neglect or refusal, order such children or relatives to make a monthly allowance at such monthly rate for the maintenance of the senior citizen as the Tribunal may deem fit .
The section also empowers the Tribunal to determine the maximum maintenance allowance, which may be prescribed by the State Government .
Essential Ingredients
- Neglect or Refusal: Children or relatives must neglect or refuse to maintain the senior citizen .
- Inability to Maintain: The senior citizen must be unable to maintain himself or herself from his own earnings or from the property owned by him .
- Tribunal's Satisfaction: The Maintenance Tribunal must be satisfied of the neglect or refusal before passing an order .
- Monthly Allowance: The Tribunal may order a monthly allowance at a rate it deems fit for the maintenance of the senior citizen .
- Jurisdiction: The Tribunal's jurisdiction is restricted to granting maintenance and does not extend to directing the handing over of possession of a property [SANJAY WALIA VS SNEHA WALIA - 2013 0 Supreme(Del) 1555].
Scope of Section
The scope of Section 9 is comprehensive, covering all senior citizens and parents who are unable to maintain themselves and whose children or relatives neglect or refuse to provide maintenance. The Act is special legislation enacted to safeguard the rights and interests of the vulnerable section of society, viz. senior citizens [Ashok Kumar Joshi S/o Achlaram Bhargava Joshi VS Achlaram Bhargava Joshi S/o Late Mancharam Bhargava - Current Civil Cases (2023)].
The Tribunal can order maintenance for expenses towards food, medical, and other requirements of the senior citizen [Ashok Kumar Joshi S/o Achlaram Bhargava Joshi VS Achlaram Bhargava Joshi S/o Late Mancharam Bhargava - Current Civil Cases (2023)]. The maximum maintenance allowance is subject to the rate prescribed by the State Government, and multiple siblings may be directed to contribute to the maintenance [Umayira K. vs K.Assya, W/o. Late Pocker Haji - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 1859].
The section also provides for the punishment of children or relatives who abandon or expose senior citizens, which can include a jail term of up to three months, a fine of up to five thousand rupees, or both .
Punishment for Section
The punishment for neglecting or refusing to maintain a senior citizen under Section 9 can include:- Imprisonment for up to three months- A fine of up to five thousand rupees- Or both
Legal Comments
- Maintenance Tribunal's Power: "Maintenance Tribunal vide impugned order held that petitioner is bound to pay monthly maintenance to his aged father (respondent no.1) for expenses towards his food, medical and other requirements – Impugned orders have been passed in due accordance with law, and do not suffer from any legal infirmity, warranting interference of this Court." [Ashok Kumar Joshi S/o Achlaram Bhargava Joshi VS Achlaram Bhargava Joshi S/o Late Mancharam Bhargava - Current Civil Cases (2023)]
- Special Legislation: "Act of 2007 is special legislation enacted to safeguard rights and interests of vulnerable section of society viz. senior citizens." [Ashok Kumar Joshi S/o Achlaram Bhargava Joshi VS Achlaram Bhargava Joshi S/o Late Mancharam Bhargava - Current Civil Cases (2023)]
- Jurisdiction of Tribunal: "The Tribunal's jurisdiction is restricted to granting maintenance and it does not have the power to direct the handing over of possession of a property." [SANJAY WALIA VS SNEHA WALIA - 2013 0 Supreme(Del) 1555]
- Maximum Maintenance Allowance: "The court clarified the interpretation of Section 9(2) of the Senior Citizens Act, holding that the maximum maintenance allowance of Rs.10,000/- applied to each senior citizen, resulting in a total amount of Rs. 20,000/- for two senior citizens." [Nisha Nitin Koppikar VS State of Maharashtra - 2024 0 Supreme(Bom) 354]
- Multiple Siblings' Liability: "The court affirmed that multiple siblings may bear responsibility for maintenance, and upheld the tribunal's interpretation of the Act as not limiting contributions to the maximum amount stated." [Umayira K. vs K.Assya, W/o. Late Pocker Haji - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 1859]
- Appeal Mechanism: "By various pronouncements by various Hon'ble Courts it has been held that remedy of an appeal available to all aggrieved persons including children relatives." [Maya Devi W/o Arun Kumar VS Vishweshwar Dayal S/o Manikram - 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 510]
- Writ Jurisdiction: "Writ petitions have been filed by petitioners non-applicants challenging orders - Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007 by Maintenance Tribunal constituted." [Maya Devi W/o Arun Kumar VS Vishweshwar Dayal S/o Manikram - 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 510]
- Duty of State: "The court emphasized the duty of the State to provide necessary succor to the inmates, irrespective of their domicile or citizenship, and highlighted the unreasonable and arbitrary denial of old-age pension and disability pension to non-bonafide inmates as a violation of their basic rights." [Court on Its Own Motion VS State of Himachal Pradesh - 2015 0 Supreme(HP) 560]
- Constitutional Validity: "The right to establish and administer educational institutions under Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India is not absolute and can be subjected to reasonable restrictions in the national interest." [Icon Education Society VS State of Madhya Pradesh - 2020 0 Supreme(MP) 1208]
- Reassessment of Maintenance: "The court set aside the Tribunal's order, emphasizing that the Tribunal's jurisdiction is restricted to granting maintenance and it does not have the power to direct the handing over of possession of a property." [SANJAY WALIA VS SNEHA WALIA - 2013 0 Supreme(Del) 1555]
- Neglect and Refusal: "If children or relatives neglect or refuse to maintain a senior citizen being unable to maintain himself, the Tribunal may order and pay a monthly allowance."
- Penalty for Abandonment: "Exposure and abandonment of senior citizen.. The penalty could be a jail term of up to three months, a fine of up to five thousand rupees, or both."
- Legal Obligation: "It makes it a legal obligation for children and heirs to provide maintenance to senior citizens and parents, by monthly allowance."
- Time-Bound Resolution: "It mandates time-bound resolution of the complaint with the possibility for securing interim relief and appeal to the appellate authority (district magistrate)."
- Comprehensive Access: "Section 9 Order for maintenance. ing comprehensive access to Indian..."
- Government Directive: "Hon'ble Courts learned Solicitor General of Court expects from Union of India to take necessary steps for issuing orders circulars or amendments in consonance with observations findings of Hon'ble Courts statement Solicitor General of India in regard to remedy of filing of an appeal to children relatives." [Maya Devi W/o Arun Kumar VS Vishweshwar Dayal S/o Manikram - 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 510]
S.10 Alteration in allowance
(1) On proof of misrepresentation or mistake of fact or a change in the circumstances of any person, receiving a monthly allowance under section 9, for the maintenance ordered under that section to pay a monthly allowance for the maintenance, the Tribunal may make such alteration, as it thinks fit, in the allowance for the maintenance.
(2) Where it appears to the Tribunal that, in consequence of any decision of a competent Civil Court, any order made under section 9 should be cancelled or varied, it shall cancel the order or, as the case may be, vary the same accordingly.
S.11 Enforcement or order of maintenance
(1) A copy of the order of maintenance and including the order regarding expenses of proceedings, as the case may be, shall be given without payment of any fee to the senior citizen or to parent, as the case may be, in whose favour it is made and such order may be enforced by any Tribunal in any place where the person against whom it is made, such Tribunal on being satisfied as to the identity of the parties and the non-payment of the allowance, or as the case may be, expenses, due.
(2) A maintenance order made under this Act shall have the same force and effect as an order passed under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(2 of 1974) and shall be executed in the manner prescribed for the execution of such order by that Code.
S.12 Option regarding maintenance in certain cases
Notwithstanding anything contained in Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(2 of 1974), where a senior citizen or a parent is entitled for maintenance under the said Chapter and also entitled for maintenance under this Act may, without prejudice to the provisions of Chapter IX of the said Code, claim such maintenance under either of those Acts but not under both.
Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 – Section 12
Introduction
Section 12 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 ("the Act") is a pivotal provision that deals with the options available to a senior citizen or parent who is entitled to maintenance. It primarily addresses the scenario where a parent or senior citizen has transferred property to a child or relative, potentially conditional upon the recipient providing maintenance. The section empowers the Tribunal to order a child or relative to make a monthly allowance for the maintenance of the parent or senior citizen, even in the context of such property transfer. The Act aims to provide a simple, speedy, and inexpensive mechanism for parents and senior citizens to claim monthly maintenance from their children or relatives, ensuring their dignity and well-being in old age.
What does Section Says
Section 12 is titled "Option regarding maintenance in certain cases." It provides that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, where a senior citizen or a parent has transferred property to a child or relative, either absolutely or conditionally, and the child or relative has failed or neglected to provide maintenance to the senior citizen or parent, the Tribunal may, on an application made by the senior citizen or parent, pass an order directing the child or relative to make a monthly allowance for the maintenance of such senior citizen or parent. The section effectively overrides any contrary provisions in other laws, giving primacy to the maintenance rights of parents and senior citizens.
Essential Ingredients
- Who can apply: A senior citizen or a parent who is unable to maintain himself from his own earnings or out of the property owned by him.
- Condition of the Act: The senior citizen or parent must have transferred property to a child or relative, either absolutely or conditionally.
- Default by the Recipient: The child or relative to whom the property has been transferred must have failed or neglected to provide maintenance to the senior citizen or parent.
- Role of the Tribunal: The Tribunal has the authority to pass an order directing the child or relative to make a monthly allowance for the maintenance of the senior citizen or parent.
- Override Clause: The section operates notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, including the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.).
Scope of Section
The scope of Section 12 is broad and remedial. It is designed to protect parents and senior citizens from being abandoned or neglected by their children or relatives, especially after the transfer of property. The section empowers the Tribunal to pass maintenance orders even in cases where the parent or senior citizen has transferred property to the child or relative. The Tribunal can direct the child or relative to make a monthly allowance for the maintenance of the parent or senior citizen. The section is intended to be a comprehensive and enforceable mechanism for ensuring the welfare of parents and senior citizens.
Punishment for Section
The Act provides for penalties for non-compliance with the Tribunal's orders. If a child or relative fails to comply with the order passed under Section 12, they may be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month or until the payment is made. The Act also provides for the possibility of a fine. The maximum maintenance allowance shall not exceed a certain amount, and persons who fail to comply with the order may be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months or fined up to a specified amount. The Act aims to ensure that the orders passed under the Act are enforceable and that parents and senior citizens receive the maintenance they are entitled to.
Legal Comments
- "Maintenance Tribunal" - The Tribunal under the Act is a quasi-judicial body that has the authority to pass maintenance orders under Section 12, directing children or relatives to make a monthly allowance for the maintenance of their parents or senior citizens. - [ "The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 ... provides a simple, speedy and inexpensive mechanism for parents and senior citizens to claim monthly maintenance from their children or relatives."]
- "Option regarding maintenance" - Section 12 is titled "Option regarding maintenance in certain cases," and it provides that a senior citizen or parent who has transferred property to a child or relative can choose to seek maintenance under this section, even if the property was transferred absolutely or conditionally. - [ "Section 12 ... Option regarding maintenance in certain cases. ... a senior citizen or a parent is entitled for maintenance under the said Chapter."]
- "Notwithstanding any other law" - Section 12 operates notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, including the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), giving primacy to the maintenance rights of parents and senior citizens under the Act. - [ "Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force ... a scheme for management of oldage homes."]
- "Transfer of property" - The section is triggered when a senior citizen or parent has transferred property to a child or relative, either absolutely or conditionally, and the recipient has failed or neglected to provide maintenance. - [ "Option regarding maintenance in certain cases.. Analyzes Section 12's stipulations about children's maintenance duties if parents transfer property with conditions."]
- "Monthly allowance" - The Tribunal may pass an order directing the child or relative to make a monthly allowance for the maintenance of the senior citizen or parent, which is the core remedy provided under Section 12. - [ "The Tribunal may pass an order directing children or relatives to make a monthly allowance at such monthly rate for the maintenance of such ..."]
- "Imprisonment for non-compliance" - A person who fails to comply with the order passed under Section 12 may be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month or until the payment is made, providing enforceability to the Tribunal's orders. - [ "The speaker explains that under the Senior Citizens' Act of 2007, denying food can lead to jail time, heavy fines, and the cancellation of ..."]
- "Maximum maintenance allowance" - The Act specifies that the maximum maintenance allowance shall not exceed a certain amount, ensuring that the financial burden on the child or relative is reasonable. - [ "The maximum maintenance allowance shall not exceed Rs.10,000 per month. persons shall be punished with imprisonment for three months or fined up to 5,000 or ..."]
- "Simple and speedy mechanism" - The Act aims to provide a simple, speedy, and inexpensive mechanism for parents and senior citizens to claim monthly maintenance from their children or relatives, underlining the welfare objective of Section 12. - [ "The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 ... provides a simple, speedy and inexpensive mechanism for parents and senior citizens to claim monthly maintenance from their children or relatives."]
- "Dignity of parents and senior citizens" - The Act aims to provide for the maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens, ensuring that they can lead a life of dignity, which is the underlying purpose of Section 12. - [ "The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 safeguards the rights, dignity, and well-being of elderly citizens."]
- "Legal responsibility of children" - The Act places a legal responsibility on children and relatives to provide care and maintenance, while also ensuring protection, healthcare, and other amenities necessary for the physical and mental well-being of parents and senior citizens. - [ "The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 ... places a legal responsibility on children and relatives to provide care and maintenance."]
- "Application to be disposed of within ninety days" - The Act mandates that an application for maintenance under Section 4, which is related to the process under Section 12, shall be disposed of within ninety days, ensuring speedy redressal. - [ "Maintenance & Welfare of Parents & Senior Citizens Act ... This application shall be disposed of within ninety days."]
- "Jurisdiction of the Tribunal" - The Tribunal has the jurisdiction to pass maintenance orders under Section 12, and its orders are enforceable through the provisions of the Act, including the possibility of imprisonment for non-compliance. - [ "The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 ... The Tribunal may pass an order directing children or relatives to make a monthly allowance at such monthly rate for the maintenance of such ..."]
- "Applicability to citizens outside India" - The Act extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir and it applies also to citizens of India outside India, making Section 12 applicable to Indian citizens residing abroad. - [ "THE-MAINTENANCE-AND-WELFARE-OF-PARENTS- ... It Extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir and it applies also to citizens of India outside India."]
- "Entitlement to maintenance" - A senior citizen or a parent who is unable to maintain himself from his own earnings or out of the property owned by him is entitled to make an application for maintenance under the Act, including under Section 12. - [ "The Maintenance And Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens ... A senior citizen or a parent who is unable to maintain himself from his own earnings or out of the property owned by him is entitled to make an application ..."]
- "Effective provisions for maintenance" - The Act aims to provide for more effective provisions for the maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens, and Section 12 is a key provision in achieving this objective. - [ "(5)The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007 aims 'to provide for more effective provisions for the maintenance and welfare of parents ...']
- "Who can make an application" - An application for maintenance under Section 4, which is the procedural section related to Section 12, may be made by a senior citizen or a parent, as the case may be, or if he is incapable, by any other person. - [ "Section 5 in The Maintenance And Welfare Of Parents And ... (1)An application for maintenance under section 4, may be made— (a)by a senior citizen or a parent, as the case may be; or (b)if he is incapable, by any other ..."]
- "Protection Order" - The Act provides for the issuance of Protection Orders under Section 18, which can be sought by senior citizens or parents who are facing domestic violence or neglect, complementing the maintenance remedies under Section 12. - [ "Appellant then preferred Criminal Misc. No. 692 of 2007 under Section 12 of the DV Act before the III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, seeking the following reliefs: 1) Pass a Protection Order under Section 18 of the DV Act ..."]
- "Residence Order" - The Act also provides for Residence Orders under Section 19, which can be sought by senior citizens or parents, ensuring their right to reside in the property of their children or relatives, which is related to the welfare provisions under Section 12. - [ "2) Pass a residence order under Section 19 of the DV Act and direct the respondent to provide for an independent residence as being provided by the respondent or in the alternative a joint residence along with the respondent where he is residing presently and for the maintenance of Rs.25,000/- per month regularly as being provided earlier or in the alternative to pay the permanent maintenance charges at the rate of Rs.25,000/- per month for the rest of the life;"]
- "Maintenance and Welfare of Parents" - The Act is designed to ensure the maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens, and Section 12 is a key provision that provides a legal remedy for parents and senior citizens who are unable to maintain themselves. - [ "The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 ... The Act places a legal responsibility on children and relatives to provide care and maintenance, while also ensuring protection, healthcare ..."]
S.13 Deposit of maintenance amount
When an order is made under this Chapter, the children or relative who is required to pay any amount in terms of such order shall, within thirty days of the date of announcing the order by the Tribunal, deposit the entire amount ordered in such manner as the Tribunal may direct.
S.14 Award of interest where any claim is allowed
Where any Tribunal makes an order for maintenance made under this Act, such Tribunal may direct that in addition to the amount of maintenance, simple interest shall also be paid at such rate and from such date not earlier than the date of making the application as may be determined by the Tribunal which shall not be less than five per cent. and not more than eighteen per cent.:
Provided that where any application for maintenance under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(2 of 1974) is pending before a Court at the commencement of this Act, then the Court shall allow the withdrawal of such application on the request of the parent and such parent shall be entitled to file an application for maintenance before the Tribunal.
S.15 Constitution of Appellate Tribunal
(1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute one Appellate Tribunal for each district to hear the appeal against the order of the Tribunal.
(2) The Appellate Tribunal shall be presided over by an officer not below the rank of District Magistrate.
S.16 Appeals
(1) Any senior citizen or a parent, as the case may be, aggrieved by an order of a Tribunal may, within sixty days from the date of the order, prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal:
Provided that on appeal, the children or relative who is required to pay any amount in terms of such maintenance order shall continue to pay to such parent the amount so ordered, in the manner directed by the Appellate Tribunal:
Provided further that the Appellate Tribunal may, entertain the appeal after the expiry of the said period of sixty days, if it is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the appeal in time.
(2) On receipt of an appeal, the Appellate Tribunal shall, cause a notice to be served upon the respondent.
(3) T
MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007 – SECTION 16: LEGAL COMMENTARY
Introduction
Section 16 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 ("the Act") is the pivotal provision governing the appellate mechanism available against orders passed by the Maintenance Tribunal constituted under the Act. It specifies the aggrieved party, the time frame for filing an appeal, the authority to which the appeal lies, and the procedural safeguards ensuring a timely resolution. This section has been the subject of extensive judicial interpretation, particularly regarding the class of persons entitled to appeal, the scope of the Appellate Tribunal's powers, and the consequences of non-compliance with statutory timelines.
What Does Section 16 Say
Section 16(1) of the Act provides that "Any senior citizen or a parent, as the case may be, aggrieved by an order of a Tribunal may, within sixty days from the date of the order, prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal." It further provides that on appeal, the children or relative required to pay maintenance shall continue to pay to the parent the amount so ordered, in the manner directed by the Appellate Tribunal. Section 16(6) mandates that the Appellate Tribunal shall make an endeavour to pronounce its order in writing within one month of the receipt of an appeal.
Essential Ingredients
The essential ingredients of a valid appeal under Section 16 are: (1) the appellant must be a senior citizen or a parent (as the case may be); (2) there must be an order of the Tribunal against which the appeal is filed; (3) the appeal must be preferred within sixty days from the date of the order; (4) the appeal must be filed before the Appellate Tribunal; and (5) the Appellate Tribunal must adjudicate the appeal within one month of its receipt.
Scope of Section 16
The scope of Section 16 has been debated in several cases. While the plain text restricts the right of appeal to "senior citizen or a parent," several High Courts have applied the principles of purposive interpretation and casus omissus to extend the right of appeal to children and relatives who are affected by the Tribunal's order. The Appellate Tribunal is mandated to pronounce its order within one month of receiving the appeal, and its order is final, subject to the condition that no appeal shall be rejected without giving an opportunity to both parties to be heard.
Punishment for Section 16
The Act does not specifically prescribe punishment for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 16. However, the Act provides for imprisonment up to three months or a fine up to ₹5,000 or both for abandonment of senior citizens (Section 19), and the Tribunal can direct the payment of maintenance as a condition precedent.
Legal Comments
- "Right of Appeal" - Section 16(1) expressly confers the right to appeal only on a senior citizen or a parent, and no other person, including children or relatives, is entitled to appeal under this provision. - [Ramesh Chandra Jaiswal VS Pankaj Jaiswal - Current Civil Cases (2025)]
- "Purposive Interpretation" - Courts have applied purposive interpretation to Section 16, holding that the right of appeal should be extended to all affected parties, including children and relatives, to avoid rendering any part of the statute ineffective. - [Chokhendra s/o Devidas Patil vs Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Maintenance of Sr. Citizen Tribunal - 2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 722]
- "Casus Omissus" - The doctrine of casus omissus has been applied by courts to fill the gap where the Act has accidentally omitted the right of appeal for children and relatives, interpreting the statute to prevent frustration of its purpose. - [Roopam @ Jyoti Sharma VS District Magistrate Lucknow - 2022 0 Supreme(All) 770]
- "Appellate Tribunal's Mandate" - The Appellate Tribunal is mandated to pronounce its order within one month of receipt of an appeal under Section 16(6), and failure to do so is a violation of the statutory timeline. - [Kamla Devi vs State of Uttarakhand - 2024 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3509]
- "Time Limit for Appeal" - The appeal under Section 16 must be filed within sixty days from the date of the order of the Tribunal, and the Appellate Tribunal may entertain an appeal after the expiry of this period only if the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause. - [Onkar Nath Gaur vs District Magistrate/President Appellate Tribunal Lko. - 2025 0 Supreme(All) 3222]
- "Finality of Appellate Tribunal's Order" - The order of the Appellate Tribunal under Section 16(5) is final, and no further appeal lies against it, subject to the condition that both parties were given an opportunity to be heard. - [Rajendra Kumar Mittal VS Addl. District Magistrate (South-East) - 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 295]
- "Jurisdiction of Tribunal" - The Maintenance Tribunal constituted under the Act does not have the power to issue an order of eviction on an application filed by a senior citizen, as the Act does not authorise such an order. - [Nahid Parvej, widow of late Shabbir Khan VS District Magistrate Pali - 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 386]
- "Eviction and Maintenance" - The District Magistrate, as an appellate authority under the Act, can ensure that no hindrance is made to a senior citizen to enjoy property as per his need, and the right to eviction is the last step where such authority finds that the need of the senior citizen is not being fulfilled. - [Krishna Kumar VS State Of U. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 992]
- "Wife of Senior Citizen" - A wife of a senior citizen aggrieved by an order of a Tribunal under the Act can prefer an appeal under Section 16, as the expression "any senior citizen" includes the wife. - [Hukmaram VS State of Rajasthan - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1607]
- "Daughter-in-law as Relative" - The term "relative" under the Act includes a daughter-in-law, and she is entitled to file an appeal against a Tribunal's order under Section 16. - [Ms. Riddhi VS Pratibha - 2024 0 Supreme(Bom) 1037]
- "Appellate Tribunal's Power of Remand" - The Appellate Tribunal under Section 16 is not conferred with the power of remand and must either reject or accept the appeal, wholly or partly as the case may be. - [Surindera Devi VS State of Punjab - 2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 1696]
- "Jurisdictional Bar" - If a party is not competent to appeal under Section 16, the High Court cannot exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226 to interfere with the order of the Tribunal, as the Act provides an exclusive statutory remedy. - [Shail Devi VS State of Jharkhand - 2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 25]
- "Summary Procedure" - The Maintenance Tribunal can adopt summary procedure while holding an enquiry under Section 8 of the Act, and it can call for production of relevant documents, including an encumbrance certificate. - [M. Mohamed Saffee VS District Collector - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 1123]
- "One-Time Settlement" - Where a petitioner and respondent have amicably settled the dispute and the respondent has received a one-time settlement, the court cannot make the petitioner suffer with an order passed by the first respondent directing cancellation of a settlement deed. - [K. Raju VS Revenue Divisional Officer, Villupuram - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 3534]
- "Imprisonment for Non-Compliance" - The Act provides for imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month or until the payment is made, whichever is earlier, for non-compliance with the maintenance order. -
- "Maximum Maintenance Allowance" - The maximum maintenance allowance which may be ordered by the Tribunal shall not exceed ten thousand rupees per month, as prescribed by the State Government. - [Onkar Nath Gaur vs District Magistrate/President Appellate Tribunal Lko. - 2025 0 Supreme(All) 2836]
- "Definition of Maintenance" - The word 'maintenance' under Section 2(b) of the Act includes provision for food, clothing, residence, and medical attendance and treatment, and it is a need-based remedy for the senior citizen/parent. - [Onkar Nath Gaur vs District Magistrate/President Appellate Tribunal Lko. - 2025 0 Supreme(All) 2836]
- "Object of the Act" - The objective of the Act is to provide quick and economical relief to senior citizens and parents who are or might be deprived of maintenance and welfare, and the right of appeal under Section 16 is a crucial part of this objective. -
- "Harmonious Construction" - The provisions of the Act must be harmoniously constructed to ensure that the right of appeal is available to all affected parties, and no party is deprived of its right to a remedy. - [Amit Kumar vs Kiran Sharma - Delhi (2021)]
S.17 Right to legal representation
Notwithstanding anything contained in any law, no party to a proceeding before a Tribunal or Appellate Tribunal shall be represented by a legal practitioner.
S.18 Maintenance Officer
(1) The State Government shall designate the District Social Welfare Officer or an officer not below the rank of a District Social Welfare Officer, by whatever name called as Maintenance Officer,
(2) The Maintenance Officer referred to in sub-section (1), shall represent a parent if he so desires, during the proceedings of the Tribunal, or the Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be.
Legal Commentary on Section 18 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007
Introduction
Section 18 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, pertains to the designation of authorities responsible for the administration and enforcement of the Act, specifically the appointment of Maintenance Officers and their functions. This section plays a crucial role in operationalizing the provisions related to the maintenance and welfare of senior citizens and parents by establishing the administrative machinery at the district level.
What does Section 18 Say
Section 18 mandates the State Government to designate District Social Welfare Officers or officers of equivalent rank as Maintenance Officers. These officers are entrusted with functions such as receiving applications for maintenance, conducting inquiries, and ensuring compliance with orders passed under the Act. The section also outlines the duties of Maintenance Officers, including the responsibility to investigate applications and facilitate the enforcement of maintenance orders.
Essential Ingredients
- Designation of Officers: The section requires the State Government to designate District Social Welfare Officers or officers of not below the rank of District Social Welfare Officer as Maintenance Officers.
- Duties of Maintenance Officers: These include receiving applications, conducting inquiries, and ensuring enforcement of maintenance orders.
- Administrative Hierarchy: Clarifies the hierarchical structure, ensuring that designated officers have the authority to perform functions under the Act.
Scope of Section
Section 18 applies to all districts within the State, mandating the appointment of Maintenance Officers to facilitate the effective implementation of the Act. It ensures that there is a dedicated authority at the district level to handle maintenance applications and related proceedings. The section aims to streamline the process, making it accessible and efficient for senior citizens and parents to seek maintenance.
Punishment for Section
Section 18 itself does not prescribe any punishment; instead, it focuses on the administrative framework. However, non-compliance or neglect by designated officers in performing their duties may attract disciplinary action or other legal consequences under relevant rules and regulations governing government officers.
Legal Comments
- Designation - The section mandates the appointment of District Social Welfare Officers or equivalent as Maintenance Officers to facilitate enforcement of the Act [["01800000000"]].
- Administrative machinery - Establishes a clear administrative hierarchy for effective implementation at the district level [["01800000000"]].
- Duties - Maintenance Officers are tasked with receiving applications, conducting inquiries, and ensuring compliance, which is vital for the Act’s enforcement [["01800000000"]].
- Implementation - Ensures decentralization of authority, making maintenance claims accessible to senior citizens and parents [["01800000000"]].
- Jurisdiction - The section applies uniformly across all districts, promoting uniformity in enforcement [["01800000000"]].
- Enforcement - Provides a mechanism for the effective enforcement of maintenance orders through designated officers [["01800000000"]].
- Legal obligations - Imposes a legal obligation on the State to appoint appropriate officers, reinforcing the statutory framework [["01800000000"]].
- Disciplinary action - While not explicitly mentioned, failure to perform duties may lead to disciplinary proceedings under service rules [["01800000000"]].
- Operational efficiency - Facilitates operational efficiency by delegating responsibilities to trained officers at the district level [["01800000000"]].
- Legal framework - Complements other provisions of the Act related to applications, inquiries, and enforcement [["01800000000"]].
- Protection of rights - Ensures that senior citizens and parents have a designated authority to protect their rights under the Act [["01800000000"]].
- Policy implementation - Reflects the policy of the government to provide accessible and effective maintenance support [["01800000000"]].
- Accountability - Establishes accountability at the district level through designated Maintenance Officers [["01800000000"]].
- Legal clarity - Provides clarity on the administrative procedures, reducing ambiguities in enforcement [["01800000000"]].
- Supporting regulations - The section is supported by rules and regulations that specify the appointment process and functions of Maintenance Officers [["01800000000"]].
Note: The references are based on the provided sources, primarily focusing on the core provisions related to Section 18, as specific detailed commentary from external legal texts was not available.
S.19 Establishment of oldage homes
(1) The State Government may establish and maintain such number of oldage homes at accessible places, as it may deem necessary, in a phased manner, beginning with at least one in each district to accommodate in such homes a minimum of one hundred fifty senior citizens who are indigent.
(2) The State Government may, prescribe a scheme for management of oldage homes, including the standards and various types of services to be provided by them which are necessary for medical care and means of entertainment to the inhabitants of such homes.
Explanation.--For the purposes of this section, "indigent" means any senior citizen who is not having sufficient means, as determined by the State Government, from time to time, to maintain himself.
S.20 Medical support for senior citizens
The State Government shall ensure that,--
(i) the Government hospitals or hospitals funded fully or partially by the Government shall provide beds for all senior citizens as far as possible;
(ii) separate queues be arranged for senior citizens;
(iii) facility for treatment of chronic, terminal and degenerative diseases is expanded for senior citizens;
(iv) research activities for chronic elderly diseases and ageing is expanded;
(v) there are earmarked facilities for geriatric patients in every district hospital duly headed by a medical officer with experience in geriatric care.
S.21 Measures for publicity, awareness, etc., for welfare of senior citizens
The State Government shall, take all measures to ensure that--
(i) the provisions of this Act are given wide publicity through public media including the television, radio and the print, at regular intervals;
(ii) the Central Government and State Government Officers, including the police officers and the members of the judicial service, are given periodic sensitization and awareness training on the issues relating to this Act;
(iii) effective co-ordination between the services provided by the concerned Ministries or Departments dealing with law, home affairs, health and welfare, to address the issues relating to the welfare of the senior citizens and periodical review of the same is conducted.
S.22 Authorities who may be specified for implementing the provision of this Act
(1) The State Government may, confer such powers and impose such duties on a District Magistrate as may be necessary, to ensure that the provisions of this Act are properly carried out and the District Magistrate may specify the officer, subordinate to him, who shall exercise all or any of the powers, and perform all or any of the duties, so conferred or imposed and the local limits within which such powers or duties shall be carried out by the officer as may be prescribed.
(2) The State Government shall prescribe a comprehensive action plan for providing protection of life and property of senior citizens.
S.23 Transfer of property to be void in certain circumstances
(1) Where any senior citizen who, after the commencement of this Act, has transferred by way of gift or otherwise, his property, subject to the condition that the transferee shall provide the basic amenities and basic physical needs to the transferor and such transferee refuses or fails to provide such amenities and physical needs, the said transfer of property shall be deemed to have been made by fraud or coercion or under undue influence and shall at the option of the transferor be declared void by the Tribunal.
(2) Where any senior citizen has a right to receive maintenance out of an estate and such estate or part thereof is transferred, the right to receive maintenance may be enforced against the transferee if the transferee has notice of the right, or if the transfer is gratuitous; but not against the transferee for consideration and without notice of right.
&nb
Legal Commentary on Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007
Introduction
Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, provides a special statutory mechanism to protect the rights of senior citizens and parents, especially concerning the transfer of property and the obligation of heirs or transferees to provide maintenance and basic amenities. It aims to prevent exploitation and neglect of elderly persons by enabling them to seek declaration of transfer deeds as void if conditions of care are not fulfilled.
What does Section 23 Say?
Section 23 primarily states that:- Transfers of property made by senior citizens or parents can be declared void if the transferee refuses or neglects to provide basic amenities and physical needs.- The section applies to transfers made after the commencement of the Act.- The section also empowers tribunals to order the restoration of property or to declare such transfers as null and void under specified circumstances.
Essential Ingredients
- Transfer of property: Must be made by a senior citizen or parent, either by gift or otherwise.
- Condition of care: The transfer must be subject to an explicit or implied obligation on the transferee to provide basic amenities and physical needs.
- Refusal or neglect: The transferee’s failure to provide such care constitutes the core breach.
- Timing: The transfer must have occurred after the Act’s commencement (24-08-2008).
- Legal proceedings: Initiated before a tribunal, which has quasi-judicial powers similar to civil courts.
Scope of Section 23
- Property transfers: Applies mainly to gratuitous transfers like gifts, settlement deeds, or revocations thereof, made after the Act’s commencement.
- Protection of elderly rights: Ensures that transfers are not used as a tool to deprive senior citizens of their property without fulfilling the obligation of care.
- Civil remedies: Provides for declaration of transfer as void, cancellation, or restoration of property.
- Limitations: Does not extend to transfers made before the Act’s commencement or where no condition of care is stipulated.
- Complementary laws: Works alongside civil law (Transfer of Property Act, Indian Contract Act) and other statutes like the Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
Punishment for Violations
- The section itself does not prescribe criminal penalties but empowers tribunals to declare transfers void and order restoration.
- Civil remedies include cancellation of deeds, eviction orders, and restoration of property.
- In cases of breach, the senior citizen or parent can approach the tribunal for relief, which may include eviction of the transferee or recovery of property.
Legal Comments (Summary with References)
- "Applicability post-2008" - Section 23 applies only to transfers made after the Act’s commencement on 24-08-2008; earlier transfers are outside its scope. [01500034289]
- "Condition of care" - For a transfer to be declared void under Section 23, there must be an explicit or implied condition that the transferee will provide basic amenities and physical needs. [Vincent VS Augustine]
- "Transfer of property" - Includes gifts, settlement deeds, and similar gratuitous transfers; the section does not apply to sale or consideration-based transfers. [Nanjappa VS State of Karnataka]
- "Timing of transfer" - Only transfers made after the Act’s commencement are subject to Section 23; pre-2008 transfers are outside its purview. [Vincent VS Augustine]
- "Burden of proof" - The senior citizen or parent must establish that the transfer was made with the condition of care, and that the transferee failed to fulfill it. [Penumetsa Suryakantam (died) VS Penmetsa Subbaraju]
- "Order of declaration" - Tribunals can declare such transfers as void, order eviction, or restore possession, but cannot directly cancel or revoke deeds without proper proceedings. [Penumetsa Suryakantam (died) VS Penmetsa Subbaraju]
- "Scope of tribunal powers" - The tribunal’s jurisdiction is limited to declarations under Section 23; it cannot entertain civil disputes unrelated to care obligations. [Promil Tomar VS State of Haryana]
- "Protection of elderly rights" - The section aims to prevent exploitation and ensure dignity and maintenance for senior citizens, aligning with constitutional protections. [Radhamani VS State of Kerala]
- "Overriding effect" - The Act’s provisions, especially Section 23, have overriding effect over general property laws like the Transfer of Property Act, especially in cases of neglect. [Lataben W/o Vyomeshbhai Makwana and D/o Pravinbhai Parmar VS Mohanlal Maganlal Makwana]
- "Evidence requirement" - The senior citizen must prove breach of care obligations; mere allegations are insufficient without supporting evidence. [Jayashankar VS Assistant Commissioner North Taluk]
- "Order of eviction" - Tribunals can order eviction of the transferee if neglect is established, but such orders must follow due process and be based on evidence. [Simrat Randhawa VS State of Punjab]
- "Legal remedy" - The section provides a civil remedy; criminal penalties are not prescribed but can be invoked under other laws if exploitation or abuse is proved. [Lataben W/o Vyomeshbhai Makwana and D/o Pravinbhai Parmar VS Mohanlal Maganlal Makwana]
- "Protection against illegal transfers" - The section acts as a safeguard against transfers made with fraudulent or coercive motives to deprive elderly persons of their property. [Ananda Gowda S/o Babu Gowda VS Nagamma W/o Late Nonnaiah Gowda]
- "Scope of property" - Includes movable and immovable property, ancestral or self-acquired, tangible or intangible, if transferred after the Act’s commencement. [Nanjundappa S/o K. M. Karibasappa VS State Of Karnataka]
- "Legal interpretation" - The courts have emphasized purposive and liberal interpretation to uphold the rights of senior citizens under Section 23. [Penumetsa Suryakantam (died) VS Penmetsa Subbaraju]
- "Family disputes" - The section is not meant to resolve family disputes but to prevent exploitation; civil courts are the proper forum for family-related property disputes. [Vellaiyammal VS Revenue Divisional Officer, Perambalur]
- "Procedure" - Proceedings are summary in nature but require adherence to principles of natural justice, including opportunity of hearing. [Pokar Ram S/o Shri Janwtaram VS Maintenance Tribunal Cum Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jodhpur]
- "Limitations" - Cannot be invoked for transfers prior to the Act’s commencement or where no care condition exists in the deed. [Radhamani VS State of Kerala]
- "Harmonious interpretation" - The section must be harmonized with other laws, including the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and the Transfer of Property Act, to prevent conflicting rights. [04200005339]
In conclusion, Section 23 of the 2007 Act is a vital legal tool designed to protect the interests of senior citizens by enabling them to challenge property transfers made with the intent to deprive them of basic amenities and care. Its effective implementation hinges on clear evidence of breach, explicit conditions in transfer deeds, and adherence to procedural safeguards, all aimed at ensuring dignity and security for the elderly.
S.24 Exposure and abandonment of senior citizen
Whoever, having the care or protection of senior citizen leaves, such senior citizen in any place with the intention of wholly abandoning such senior citizen, shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months or fine which may extend to five thousand rupees or with both.
Legal Commentary on Section 24 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007
Introduction
The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") was enacted to provide a legal framework for the maintenance and welfare of senior citizens and parents. Section 24 specifically addresses the issue of abandonment and exposure of senior citizens, establishing legal consequences for those who neglect their responsibilities towards them.
What Does Section 24 Say
Section 24 of the Act states that any person who has the care or protection of a senior citizen and leaves them in any place with the intention of wholly abandoning them shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months or with a fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or both.
Essential Ingredients
- Care or Protection: The individual must have had the responsibility for the care or protection of the senior citizen.
- Leaving the Senior Citizen: The act of leaving the senior citizen in a place must be intentional.
- Intention of Abandonment: There must be a clear intention to abandon the senior citizen wholly.
Scope of Section
- The section applies to any individual responsible for the care of a senior citizen.
- It encompasses both physical abandonment and neglect of care.
- The provision is designed to protect senior citizens from being left without support or care.
Punishment for Section
- The punishment for violating this section can include:
- Imprisonment for up to three months.
- A fine of up to five thousand rupees.
- Both imprisonment and fine may be imposed.
Legal Comments
- Responsibility - "Care Obligation" - The Act emphasizes the legal obligation of children and relatives to care for senior citizens, reinforcing societal norms regarding familial responsibility - .
- Intent Requirement - "Intent to Abandon" - Courts have interpreted that mere neglect does not constitute abandonment unless there is clear intent to leave the senior citizen without care - [ Toodi Bharat Ratna VS State of Telangana].
- Cognizable Offence - "Cognizability" - Offences under this section are cognizable and bailable, allowing police to take immediate action upon receiving a complaint - [ Sriram Yashwanth, S/o. S. Venkatesh VS State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad].
- Judicial Interpretation - "Judicial Discretion" - Courts have the discretion to assess the intent behind the actions of the accused, which can significantly affect the outcome of cases under this section - [ Jayasree VS Union of India].
- Misuse Concerns - "Potential for Misuse" - There are concerns regarding the potential misuse of this provision, as it could be employed against individuals who may not have abandoned but rather faced familial disputes - [ Jayasree VS Union of India].
- Legal Standing - "Legal Standing of Senior Citizens" - Senior citizens have the right to seek legal recourse under this section, ensuring their protection under the law - [ KAWALJEET KAUR @ KHUSHBU DUA VS SURJEET DUA].
- Burden of Proof - "Burden of Proof" - The burden of proof lies on the prosecution to establish that the accused had the intention to abandon the senior citizen - [ Toodi Bharat Ratna VS State of Telangana].
- Summary Trials - "Summary Trials" - Offences under this section are to be tried summarily, expediting the legal process for the protection of senior citizens - [ Sriram Yashwanth, S/o. S. Venkatesh VS State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad].
- Age Requirement - "Age of Senior Citizens" - The definition of a senior citizen under the Act is crucial, as only those above 60 years can invoke this section - [ KAWALJEET KAUR @ KHUSHBU DUA VS SURJEET DUA].
- Civil vs. Criminal Jurisdiction - "Jurisdictional Clarity" - The Act does not interfere with civil disputes regarding property but focuses on the welfare of senior citizens, highlighting the need for clear jurisdictional boundaries - [ Anu Banka VS Suman Lata Gupta].
- Legal Heir Substitution - "Substitution of Legal Heirs" - Legal heirs can continue proceedings under this section even after the death of the original complainant, ensuring continuity in seeking justice - [ Sanjit Kumar Mishra VS Ranjit Mishra].
- Constitutional Validity - "Constitutional Challenges" - Challenges to the constitutional validity of the Act, particularly Section 24, have been raised, focusing on potential misuse and violation of rights - [ Jayasree VS Union of India].
- Police Authority - "Police Authority" - Police have the authority to register complaints under this section, reflecting the seriousness of the issue of abandonment - [ Sriram Yashwanth, S/o. S. Venkatesh VS State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad].
- Impact on Families - "Family Dynamics" - The section aims to address the dynamics of family relationships and the responsibilities of children towards their aging parents - [ Pramod Ranjankar S/o Dharmi Mohankar VS Arunashankar S/o Pramod Rajankar].
- Interim Relief - "Interim Measures" - Courts may provide interim relief to senior citizens facing immediate threats or abandonment, ensuring their safety - [ Pramod Ranjankar S/o Dharmi Mohankar VS Arunashankar S/o Pramod Rajankar].
- Public Awareness - "Awareness Campaigns" - There is a need for public awareness campaigns to educate families about their responsibilities under the Act - .
- Legislative Intent - "Legislative Intent" - The Act reflects a strong legislative intent to protect the rights and dignity of senior citizens, emphasizing their welfare - .
- Judicial Precedents - "Precedents" - Judicial interpretations of Section 24 have set important precedents for future cases involving abandonment and neglect of senior citizens - [ Jayasree VS Union of India].
This commentary provides a comprehensive overview of Section 24 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, highlighting its significance in protecting the rights of senior citizens in India.
S.25 Cognizance of offences
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(2 of 1974), every offence under this Act shall be cognizable and bailable.
(2) An offence under this Act shall be tried summarily by a Magistrate.
S.26 Officers to be public servants
Every officer or staff appointed to exercise functions under this Act shall be deemed to be a public servant within the meaning of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code(45 of 1860).
S.27 Jurisdiction of civil courts barred
No Civil Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of any matter to which any provision of this Act applies and no injunction shall be granted by any Civil Court in respect of anything which is done or intended to be done by or under this Act.
S.28 Protection of action taken in good faith
No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against the Central Government, the State Governments or the local authority or any officer of the Government in respect of anything which is done in good faith or intended to be done in pursuance of this Act and any rules or orders made thereunder.
S.29 Power to remove difficulties
If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the State Government may, by order published in the Official Gazette, make such provisions not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, as appear to it to be necessary or expedient for removing the difficulty:
Provided that no such order shall be made after the expiry of a period of two years from the date of the commencement of this Act.
S.30 Power of Central Government to give directions
The Central Government may give directions to State Governments as to the carrying into execution of the provisions of this Act.
S.31 Power of Central Government to review
The Central Government may make periodic review and monitor the progress of the implementation of the provisions of this Act by the State Governments.
S.32 Power of State Government to make rules
(1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the purposes of this Act.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for--
(a) the manner of holding inquiry under section 5 subject to such rules as may be prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 8;
(b) the power and procedure of the Tribunal for other purposes under sub-section (2) of section 8;
(c) the maximum maintenance allowance which may be ordered by the Tribunal under sub-section (2) of section 9;
(d) the scheme for management of oldage homes, including the standards and various types of services to be provided by them which are necessary for medical c