MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT 2007
(1) This Act may be called the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
(2) It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir and it applies also to citizens of India outside India.
(3) It shall come into force in a State on such date as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.
Section 1 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, lays down the preliminary provisions, including the title, extent, and commencement of the Act. It sets the foundation for the entire legislation aimed at ensuring the welfare, maintenance, and protection of senior citizens and parents.
Section 1 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, functions as the foundational clause establishing the title, scope, territorial extent, and commencement of the legislation. It provides the necessary legal clarity and flexibility for phased implementation across India. While it does not prescribe punishments, it sets the stage for a comprehensive framework aimed at safeguarding the dignity, rights, and welfare of senior citizens, with subsequent sections detailing enforcement mechanisms, penalties, and procedural safeguards.
Note: This commentary synthesizes legal insights from the provided sources, emphasizing the importance of Section 1 as the legislative foundation for the entire Act.
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,--
(a) "children" includes son, daughter, grandson and grand-daughter but does not include a minor;
(b) "maintenance" includes provision for food, clothing, residence and medical attendance and treatment;
(c) "minor" means a person who, under the provisions of the Majority Act, 1875(9 of 1875), is deemed not to have attained the age of majority;
(d) "parent" means father or mother whether biological, adoptive or step father or step mother, as the case may be, whether or not the father or the mother is a senior citizen;
(e) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made by the State Government under this Act;
(f) "
The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any enactment other than this Act, or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any enactment other than this Act.
Legal Comments
"Section 3 (Overriding effect)" - The Act’s non-obstante clause places MWPSC Act above conflicting provisions in other enactments, guiding welfare-driven adjudication and harmonization with DV Act where relevant. [Sources: "T. Vimalanathan VS District Collector, Tiruvannamalai - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2255", "Satyendra Kumar Singh VS State of U. P. - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 2039", "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)"]
"Essential scope" - Section 3, 4, 5 collectively establish maintenance, residence, and welfare for senior citizens/parents, with Tribunal powers to secure maintenance and, where needed, eviction to protect welfare. [Sources: "Hemant Gamanlal Mehta VS State of Maharashtra - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1715", "Shadab Khairi VS State - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 250", "Savita Avinash Khamkar vs Jyotiram Marutirao Khamkar - 2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 2036"]
"Prevalence of eviction power" - Maintenance Tribunals can order eviction of family members to secure welfare of a senior citizen, but such orders must be balanced with other rights (e.g., DV Act rights in shared households). [Sources: "Hemant Gamanlal Mehta VS State of Maharashtra - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1715", "Lataben W/o Vyomeshbhai Makwana and D/o Pravinbhai Parmar VS Mohanlal Maganlal Makwana - Current Civil Cases (2023)", "Ritika Prashant Jasani VS Anjana Niranjan Jasani - Crimes (2021)"]
"Overriding harmony with DV Act" - In conflicts between MWPSC Act evictions and DV Act rights to a shared household, courts advocate harmonious construction rather than outright override; eviction cannot extinguish DV rights. [Sources: "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)", "Ritika Prashant Jasani VS Anjana Niranjan Jasani - Crimes (2021)", "Savita Avinash Khamkar vs Jyotiram Marutirao Khamkar - 2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 2036"]
"Right to maintenance and residence" - Act imposes a statutory duty on children to maintain parents, extending to residence and basic amenities; denial of maintenance or neglect can trigger Section 23 remedies. [Sources: "T. Vimalanathan VS District Collector, Tiruvannamalai - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2255", "Sheetal Devang Shah VS Presiding Officer Of The Maintenance And ) Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1496", "Satyendra Kumar Singh VS State of U. P. - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 2039"]
"Section 23 – transfer of property void for neglect" - If a senior citizen transfers property with a condition of care and the transferee fails to provide basic amenities, such transfer can be voided as fraud/undue influence; remedies include cancellation. [Sources: "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)", "Sandeep Gulati VS Divisional Commissioner, Office of The Secreatry-Cum-Divisional Commissioner, Department Of Revenue, Govt. of Nct of Delhi - 2020 0 Supreme(Del) 324", "Court on Its Own Motion VS State of Himachal Pradesh - 2015 0 Supreme(HP) 560"]
"Section 23 – gift deed scrutiny" - Gift deeds voidable under Section 23 if the transferee refuses to provide basic amenities; courts scrutinize surrounding circumstances rather than formal labels. [Sources: "Court on Its Own Motion VS State of Himachal Pradesh - 2015 0 Supreme(HP) 560", "Sheetal Devang Shah VS Presiding Officer Of The Maintenance And ) Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1496", "MAHESH SYAL VS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 323"]
"Section 24 – abandonment not always prosecutable" - Courts have held that transporting a senior citizen or not providing maintenance does not automatically constitute abandonment; Section 24 prosecutions require careful factual fit. [Sources: "Pramod John, S/o. M. R. Mani VS State Of Kerala, Represented By Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 637", "Beena Thakur W/o Ravi Prakash Singh VS State of Chhattisgarh - 2023 0 Supreme(Chh) 207"]
"Section 21/Rule framework (Delhi/Bihar variants)" - Rules under Delhi/Bihar variants allocate maintenance evictions and life-protection duties to local tribunals, with appellate avenues and clear procedural guidelines to avoid misuse. [Sources: "Rakhi Sharma VS State - 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 1928", "Shadab Khairi VS State - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 250", "Rambilash Gupta VS State of Bihar - 2023 0 Supreme(Pat) 216"]
"Premature/untimely evictions—remedial relief" - Where eviction is premature or unjust, courts direct restoration of possession and order inquiries into eviction procedures to ensure due process. [Sources: "Pooja Mehta VS Government of NCT of Delhi - 2020 0 Supreme(Del) 1010", "Shadab Khairi VS State - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 250"]
"Shared household concept and DV Act integration" - Court rulings emphasize that a shared household under DV Act includes residence in which the aggrieved person lived, regardless of title, and that MWPSC’s broad protections should harmonize with DV protections. [Sources: "Jagdeepbhai Chandulal Patel VS Reshma Ruchin Patel - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 262", "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)", "Ritika Prashant Jasani VS Anjana Niranjan Jasani - Crimes (2021)"]
"Maintenance Tribunal jurisdiction limits" - Tribunals have explicit jurisdiction to decide on maintenance and related welfare matters, including eviction in certain scenarios, but not to decide civil partition disputes or purely private ownership questions. [Sources: "Rakhi Sharma VS State - 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 1928", "Akhilesh Kumar VS State of UP - 2019 0 Supreme(All) 509", "Jaiprakash Tiwari VS State of U. P. - 2021 0 Supreme(All) 391"]
"Welfare-centric approach" - The Act is welfare-centric: courts interpret sections to ensure basic amenities, health care, and shelter; neglect or abuse triggers protective measures, not punitive isolation. [Sources: "Court on Its Own Motion VS State of Himachal Pradesh - 2015 0 Supreme(HP) 560", "S. NEELAVATHI VS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT COLLECTOR - 2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 4270", "Hemant Gamanlal Mehta VS State of Maharashtra - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1715"]
"Overriding protection for elderly in property transfers" - When transfers occur post-retirement or to secure care, Section 23’s protective regime can override inconsistent transfers, to safeguard welfare and care obligations. [Sources: "T. Vimalanathan VS District Collector, Tiruvannamalai - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2255", "Sandeep Gulati VS Divisional Commissioner, Office of The Secreatry-Cum-Divisional Commissioner, Department Of Revenue, Govt. of Nct of Delhi - 2020 0 Supreme(Del) 324", "Parkash Singh VS Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sangrur-cum-Maintenance Tribunal - 2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 868"]
"Role of other statutes in welfare cases" - Courts insist on harmonization with other welfare statutes (DV Act, CPWD Act, etc.) to avoid undermining protections for women and elderly; the MWPSC Act does not nullify other rights. [Sources: "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)", "Savita Avinash Khamkar vs Jyotiram Marutirao Khamkar - 2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 2036", "Jagdeepbhai Chandulal Patel VS Reshma Ruchin Patel - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 262"]
"Remedies and appeal avenues" - Where orders affect maintenance or eviction, parties can pursue appeals before Appellate Authorities, Divisional Commissioners, or Civil Courts where applicable, preserving rights to challenge Tribunal decisions. [Sources: "Rakhi Sharma VS State - 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 1928", "Akhilesh Kumar VS State of UP - 2019 0 Supreme(All) 509", "Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd VS S. Veerapandi - 2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 3185"]
"Judicial oversight and safeguarding against misuse" - Higher courts monitor Tribunal orders to prevent misuse of the MWPSC Act for eviction or punitive purposes, ensuring due process and proportional relief. [Sources: "Savita Avinash Khamkar vs Jyotiram Marutirao Khamkar - 2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 2036", "Shadab Khairi VS State - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 250", "Suresh Sharma VS Dhanwanti Sharma - 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 347"]
"Medical and welfare entitlements" - Courts recognize the Act’s alignment with health and welfare needs, including potential medical reimbursements for dependent parents under broader schemes, interpreting "family" and "maintenance" purposively. [Sources: "Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd VS S. Veerapandi - 2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 3185", "S. NEELAVATHI VS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-DISTRICT COLLECTOR - 2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 4270"]
"Penalty regime (Section 9/Section 23 interplay)" - The Act caps maintenance amounts (e.g., Rs 10,000 per month in some contexts) but allows higher relief where warranted by welfare needs; jurisdictions vary by state, requiring factual calibration. [Sources: "Hemant Gamanlal Mehta VS State of Maharashtra - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1715", "Suresh VS State of Kerala - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 167", "Biplab Ganguly VS Biswanath Ganguly - 2022 0 Supreme(Cal) 1293"]
"Non-obstante clause as policy tool" - The non-obstante provision supports welfare policy over technical title-based objections; but courts stress harmonious implementation with existing protective statutes. [Sources: "T. Vimalanathan VS District Collector, Tiruvannamalai - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2255", "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)"]
"Eviction orders in parental abuse cases" - Tribunals can order eviction in cases of parental abuse to protect the elder, subject to proper proceedings and safeguards. [Sources: "Shadab Khairi VS State - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 250", "Mayur Vaijanath Tawde VS State Of Maharashtra - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 941"]
"Public welfare orientation" - The MWPSC Act’s core objective is public welfare for seniors, not merely private dispute resolution; this informs approach to both maintenance and possession. [Sources: "" (general description in multiple sources), "Suryakant Kisan Pawar VS Deputy Collector, Mumbai and Presiding Officer Parents and Senior Citizens Subsistence Tribunal, Mumbai - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 383"]
"Judicial caution on piecemeal litigation" - Courts discourage raising discrete questions in separate petitions; parties should present all material facts, ensuring coherent adjudication. [Sources: "Talatam Nageswara Rao, S/o. Talatam Veeranna vs Union Of India, Represented By Its Pri.Secretary, Financial Services Department - 2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9414"]
"Consequences for non-compliance" - Tribunals can impose warrants, attachment, or imprisonment for failure to pay maintenance, with enforcement measures described under Civil Procedure/CrPC integration. [Sources: "Suresh VS State of Kerala - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 167", "Abdul Kader Mohammed Iqbal VS District Collector Malappuram - 2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 477"]
"Notification and dissemination of remedies" - Courts direct tribunals to inform litigants clearly about available remedies and appeals to reduce confusion over multiple forums. [Sources: "Rakhi Sharma VS State - 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 1928"]
"Key practical takeaway" - Section 3’s overriding welfare aim should harmonize with other protective statutes, ensuring elderly care while protecting the rights of women in shared households. [Sources: "Hiral Valjibhai Bhua VS Manjulaben Manjibhai Savaliya - Current Civil Cases (2023)", "Ritika Prashant Jasani VS Anjana Niranjan Jasani - Crimes (2021)", "Jagdeepbhai Chandulal Patel VS Reshma Ruchin Patel - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 262"]
(1) A senior citizen including parent who is unable to maintain himself from his own earning or out of the property owned by him, shall be entitled to make an application under section 5 in case of--
(i) parent or grand-parent, against one or more of his children not being a minor;
(ii) a childless senior citizen, against such of his relative referred to in clause (g) of section 2.
(2) The obligation of the children or relative, as the case may be, to maintain a senior citizen extends to the needs of such citizen so that senior citizen may lead a normal life.
(3) The obligation of the children to maintain his or her parent extends to the needs of such parent either father or mother or both, as the case may be, so that such parent may lead a normal l
Section 4 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereafter "the Act") establishes the legal right of senior citizens and parents to claim maintenance if they are unable to support themselves from their own earnings or property. The section aims to protect the dignity, well-being, and financial security of elderly persons, especially in the context of declining joint family systems.
Section 4 provides that:- A senior citizen or parent who cannot maintain himself/herself from his/her own earnings or property can apply for maintenance.- The application can be made against children, relatives, or any other person having sufficient means.- Maintenance includes provisions for food, clothing, residence, medical attendance, and treatment.- The section emphasizes the obligation of children and relatives to provide support to elderly parents or senior citizens, ensuring they lead a life of dignity.
Section 4 of the Act solidifies the legal obligation of children and relatives to support elderly parents and senior citizens, with comprehensive provisions for maintenance, enforcement, and protection of property rights. Courts and tribunals are empowered to ensure swift justice, prevent abuse or deprivation, and uphold the dignity of senior citizens in accordance with constitutional principles and social justice objectives.
(1) An application for maintenance under section 4, may be made--
(a) by a senior citizen or a parent, as the case may be; or
(b) if he is incapable, by any other person or organisation authorised by him; or
(c) the Tribunal may take cognizance suo motu.
Explanation.-- For the purposes of this section "organisation" means any voluntary association registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860(21 of 1960), or any other law for the time being in force.
(2) The Tribunal may, during the pendency of the proceeding regarding monthly, allowance for the maintenance under this section, order such children or relative to make a monthly allowance for the interim maintenance of such senior citizen including p
Section 5 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, establishes the procedure for senior citizens or parents to apply for maintenance when they are unable to support themselves. It provides a legal framework for ensuring the welfare of elderly persons, emphasizing their right to claim maintenance from children or relatives who have the means to support them. This section is central to the Act’s objective of safeguarding the dignity, health, and financial security of senior citizens.
While Section 5 itself primarily deals with the application process and orders for maintenance, violations of maintenance orders or neglecting senior citizens can attract penalties under other provisions of the Act, including imprisonment or fines, especially if the responsible person refuses or neglects to comply with the Tribunal’s orders.
Note: The interpretation of Section 5 is reinforced by judicial pronouncements emphasizing the importance of providing a simplified, accessible, and proactive legal mechanism for the welfare of elderly persons, aligning with the constitutional mandate of dignity and right to life under Article 21.
(1) The proceedings under section 5 may be taken against any children or relative in any district--
(a) where he resides or last resided; or
(b) where children or relative resides.
(2) On receipt of the application under section 5, the Tribunal shall issue a process for procuring the presence of children or relative against whom the application is filed.
(3) For securing the attendance of children or relative the Tribunal shall have the power of a Judicial Magistrate of first class as provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(2 of 1974).
(4) All evidence to such proceedings shall be taken in the presence of the children or relative against whom an order for payment of maintenance is proposed to
(1) The State Government shall within a period of six months from the date of the commencement of this Act, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute for each Sub-division one or more Tribunals as may be specified in the notification for the purpose of adjudicating and deciding upon the order for maintenance under section 5.
(2) The Tribunal shall be presided over by an officer not below the rank of Sub-Divisional Officer of a State.
(3) Where two or more Tribunals are constituted for any area, the State Government may, by general or special order, regulate the distribution of business among them.
(1) In holding any inquiry under section 5, the Tribunal may, subject to any rules that may be prescribed by the State Government in this behalf, follow such summary procedure as it deems fit.
(2) The Tribunal shall have all the powers of a Civil Court for the purpose of taking evidence on oath and of enforcing the attendance of witnesses and of compelling the discovery and production of documents and material objects and for such other purposes as may be prescribed; and the Tribunal shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for all the purposes of section 195 and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
(3) Subject to any rule that may be made in this behalf, the Tribunal may, for the purpose of adjudicating and deciding upon any claim for maintenance, choose one or more persons possessing special knowledge of any matter relevant
(1) If children or relatives, as the case may be, neglect or refuse to maintain a senior citizen being unable to maintain himself, the Tribunal may, on being satisfied of such neglect or refusal, order such children or relatives to make a monthly allowance at such monthly rate for the maintenance of such senior citizen, as the Tribunal may deem fit and to pay the same to such senior citizen as the Tribunal may, from time to time, direct.
(2) The maximum maintenance allowance which may be ordered by such Tribunal shall be such as may be prescribed by the State Government which shall not exceed ten thousand rupees per month.
(1) On proof of misrepresentation or mistake of fact or a change in the circumstances of any person, receiving a monthly allowance under section 9, for the maintenance ordered under that section to pay a monthly allowance for the maintenance, the Tribunal may make such alteration, as it thinks fit, in the allowance for the maintenance.
(2) Where it appears to the Tribunal that, in consequence of any decision of a competent Civil Court, any order made under section 9 should be cancelled or varied, it shall cancel the order or, as the case may be, vary the same accordingly.
(1) A copy of the order of maintenance and including the order regarding expenses of proceedings, as the case may be, shall be given without payment of any fee to the senior citizen or to parent, as the case may be, in whose favour it is made and such order may be enforced by any Tribunal in any place where the person against whom it is made, such Tribunal on being satisfied as to the identity of the parties and the non-payment of the allowance, or as the case may be, expenses, due.
(2) A maintenance order made under this Act shall have the same force and effect as an order passed under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(2 of 1974) and shall be executed in the manner prescribed for the execution of such order by that Code.
Notwithstanding anything contained in Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(2 of 1974), where a senior citizen or a parent is entitled for maintenance under the said Chapter and also entitled for maintenance under this Act may, without prejudice to the provisions of Chapter IX of the said Code, claim such maintenance under either of those Acts but not under both.
When an order is made under this Chapter, the children or relative who is required to pay any amount in terms of such order shall, within thirty days of the date of announcing the order by the Tribunal, deposit the entire amount ordered in such manner as the Tribunal may direct.
Where any Tribunal makes an order for maintenance made under this Act, such Tribunal may direct that in addition to the amount of maintenance, simple interest shall also be paid at such rate and from such date not earlier than the date of making the application as may be determined by the Tribunal which shall not be less than five per cent. and not more than eighteen per cent.:
Provided that where any application for maintenance under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(2 of 1974) is pending before a Court at the commencement of this Act, then the Court shall allow the withdrawal of such application on the request of the parent and such parent shall be entitled to file an application for maintenance before the Tribunal.
(1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute one Appellate Tribunal for each district to hear the appeal against the order of the Tribunal.
(2) The Appellate Tribunal shall be presided over by an officer not below the rank of District Magistrate.
(1) Any senior citizen or a parent, as the case may be, aggrieved by an order of a Tribunal may, within sixty days from the date of the order, prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal:
Provided that on appeal, the children or relative who is required to pay any amount in terms of such maintenance order shall continue to pay to such parent the amount so ordered, in the manner directed by the Appellate Tribunal:
Provided further that the Appellate Tribunal may, entertain the appeal after the expiry of the said period of sixty days, if it is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the appeal in time.
(2) On receipt of an appeal, the Appellate Tribunal shall, cause a notice to be served upon the respondent.
(3) T
Notwithstanding anything contained in any law, no party to a proceeding before a Tribunal or Appellate Tribunal shall be represented by a legal practitioner.
(1) The State Government shall designate the District Social Welfare Officer or an officer not below the rank of a District Social Welfare Officer, by whatever name called as Maintenance Officer,
(2) The Maintenance Officer referred to in sub-section (1), shall represent a parent if he so desires, during the proceedings of the Tribunal, or the Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be.
Section 18 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, pertains to the designation of authorities responsible for the administration and enforcement of the Act, specifically the appointment of Maintenance Officers and their functions. This section plays a crucial role in operationalizing the provisions related to the maintenance and welfare of senior citizens and parents by establishing the administrative machinery at the district level.
Section 18 mandates the State Government to designate District Social Welfare Officers or officers of equivalent rank as Maintenance Officers. These officers are entrusted with functions such as receiving applications for maintenance, conducting inquiries, and ensuring compliance with orders passed under the Act. The section also outlines the duties of Maintenance Officers, including the responsibility to investigate applications and facilitate the enforcement of maintenance orders.
Section 18 applies to all districts within the State, mandating the appointment of Maintenance Officers to facilitate the effective implementation of the Act. It ensures that there is a dedicated authority at the district level to handle maintenance applications and related proceedings. The section aims to streamline the process, making it accessible and efficient for senior citizens and parents to seek maintenance.
Section 18 itself does not prescribe any punishment; instead, it focuses on the administrative framework. However, non-compliance or neglect by designated officers in performing their duties may attract disciplinary action or other legal consequences under relevant rules and regulations governing government officers.
Note: The references are based on the provided sources, primarily focusing on the core provisions related to Section 18, as specific detailed commentary from external legal texts was not available.
(1) The State Government may establish and maintain such number of oldage homes at accessible places, as it may deem necessary, in a phased manner, beginning with at least one in each district to accommodate in such homes a minimum of one hundred fifty senior citizens who are indigent.
(2) The State Government may, prescribe a scheme for management of oldage homes, including the standards and various types of services to be provided by them which are necessary for medical care and means of entertainment to the inhabitants of such homes.
Explanation.--For the purposes of this section, "indigent" means any senior citizen who is not having sufficient means, as determined by the State Government, from time to time, to maintain himself.
The State Government shall ensure that,--
(i) the Government hospitals or hospitals funded fully or partially by the Government shall provide beds for all senior citizens as far as possible;
(ii) separate queues be arranged for senior citizens;
(iii) facility for treatment of chronic, terminal and degenerative diseases is expanded for senior citizens;
(iv) research activities for chronic elderly diseases and ageing is expanded;
(v) there are earmarked facilities for geriatric patients in every district hospital duly headed by a medical officer with experience in geriatric care.
The State Government shall, take all measures to ensure that--
(i) the provisions of this Act are given wide publicity through public media including the television, radio and the print, at regular intervals;
(ii) the Central Government and State Government Officers, including the police officers and the members of the judicial service, are given periodic sensitization and awareness training on the issues relating to this Act;
(iii) effective co-ordination between the services provided by the concerned Ministries or Departments dealing with law, home affairs, health and welfare, to address the issues relating to the welfare of the senior citizens and periodical review of the same is conducted.
(1) The State Government may, confer such powers and impose such duties on a District Magistrate as may be necessary, to ensure that the provisions of this Act are properly carried out and the District Magistrate may specify the officer, subordinate to him, who shall exercise all or any of the powers, and perform all or any of the duties, so conferred or imposed and the local limits within which such powers or duties shall be carried out by the officer as may be prescribed.
(2) The State Government shall prescribe a comprehensive action plan for providing protection of life and property of senior citizens.
(1) Where any senior citizen who, after the commencement of this Act, has transferred by way of gift or otherwise, his property, subject to the condition that the transferee shall provide the basic amenities and basic physical needs to the transferor and such transferee refuses or fails to provide such amenities and physical needs, the said transfer of property shall be deemed to have been made by fraud or coercion or under undue influence and shall at the option of the transferor be declared void by the Tribunal.
(2) Where any senior citizen has a right to receive maintenance out of an estate and such estate or part thereof is transferred, the right to receive maintenance may be enforced against the transferee if the transferee has notice of the right, or if the transfer is gratuitous; but not against the transferee for consideration and without notice of right.
&nb
Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, provides a special statutory mechanism to protect the rights of senior citizens and parents, especially concerning the transfer of property and the obligation of heirs or transferees to provide maintenance and basic amenities. It aims to prevent exploitation and neglect of elderly persons by enabling them to seek declaration of transfer deeds as void if conditions of care are not fulfilled.
Section 23 primarily states that:- Transfers of property made by senior citizens or parents can be declared void if the transferee refuses or neglects to provide basic amenities and physical needs.- The section applies to transfers made after the commencement of the Act.- The section also empowers tribunals to order the restoration of property or to declare such transfers as null and void under specified circumstances.
In conclusion, Section 23 of the 2007 Act is a vital legal tool designed to protect the interests of senior citizens by enabling them to challenge property transfers made with the intent to deprive them of basic amenities and care. Its effective implementation hinges on clear evidence of breach, explicit conditions in transfer deeds, and adherence to procedural safeguards, all aimed at ensuring dignity and security for the elderly.
Whoever, having the care or protection of senior citizen leaves, such senior citizen in any place with the intention of wholly abandoning such senior citizen, shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months or fine which may extend to five thousand rupees or with both.
The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") was enacted to provide a legal framework for the maintenance and welfare of senior citizens and parents. Section 24 specifically addresses the issue of abandonment and exposure of senior citizens, establishing legal consequences for those who neglect their responsibilities towards them.
Section 24 of the Act states that any person who has the care or protection of a senior citizen and leaves them in any place with the intention of wholly abandoning them shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months or with a fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or both.
This commentary provides a comprehensive overview of Section 24 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, highlighting its significance in protecting the rights of senior citizens in India.
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(2 of 1974), every offence under this Act shall be cognizable and bailable.
(2) An offence under this Act shall be tried summarily by a Magistrate.
Every officer or staff appointed to exercise functions under this Act shall be deemed to be a public servant within the meaning of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code(45 of 1860).
No Civil Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of any matter to which any provision of this Act applies and no injunction shall be granted by any Civil Court in respect of anything which is done or intended to be done by or under this Act.
No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against the Central Government, the State Governments or the local authority or any officer of the Government in respect of anything which is done in good faith or intended to be done in pursuance of this Act and any rules or orders made thereunder.
If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the State Government may, by order published in the Official Gazette, make such provisions not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, as appear to it to be necessary or expedient for removing the difficulty:
Provided that no such order shall be made after the expiry of a period of two years from the date of the commencement of this Act.
The Central Government may give directions to State Governments as to the carrying into execution of the provisions of this Act.
The Central Government may make periodic review and monitor the progress of the implementation of the provisions of this Act by the State Governments.
(1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the purposes of this Act.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for--
(a) the manner of holding inquiry under section 5 subject to such rules as may be prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 8;
(b) the power and procedure of the Tribunal for other purposes under sub-section (2) of section 8;
(c) the maximum maintenance allowance which may be ordered by the Tribunal under sub-section (2) of section 9;
(d) the scheme for management of oldage homes, including the standards and various types of services to be provided by them which are necessary for medical c
Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.