Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Narula, J
Ranjith Rebello – Appellant
Versus
Mata Sundri College For Women – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of dispute regarding recruitment results. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's contention regarding arbitrary selection procedures. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. limited scope of judicial review and doctrine of acquiescence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. validity of qualifying benchmarks and policy discretion. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. effect of subsequent recruitment on maintainability of petitions. (Para 13 , 14) |
O R D E R
07.01.2026
1. The present petition assails the result declared on 10th May, 2023 by Respondent No. 1, Mata Sundri College for Women, in respect of the post of Administrative Officer (VH Category).
2. The Petitioner, a person with visual impairment, applied pursuant to the advertisement issued for the said post. A written examination was held on 6th February, 2023, followed by an interview on 10th May, 2023. The result declared on the same date records that no candidate was found suitable and that the post would be re-advertised in terms of the applicable Recruitment Rules.
3. The Petitioner, being unsuccessful seeks quashing of the result dated 10th May, 2023 and a restraint against filling the post or proceeding with a fresh recruitment process. The reliefs sought a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
