Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J
Amar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Roppen Transportation Services Pvt Ltd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions seeking accessibility for persons with disabilities in digital transport platforms. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court monitoring and directing service providers to implement accessibility features based on ongoing compliance. (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. interpretation of digital accessibility as a substantive equality obligation under s. 42 of the act. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. continuous government duty to enforce accessibility standards beyond policy formulation. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. closure of proceedings with liberty to approach the court for future grievances. (Para 17 , 18) |
JUDGEMENT
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL)
1. The petition is for the following reliefs:
a) ISSUE an appropriate Writ, direction or order, including one directing the Respondents No.2 and 3 to direct Respondent No. 1 to
take immediate, effective, and comprehensive steps in effecting the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, ensuring that the rights and accessibility of persons with disabilities are safeguarded. These steps should include, but not be limited to, mandating accessibility audits, providing accessibility training for staff, implementing clear a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
