IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SMT CHETNA SIKDAR – Appellant
Versus
VINOD KUMAR MEHTA – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’) has been filed on behalf of the Appellant against the Order and Judgment dated 28.05.2025 whereby the learned District Judge-02, New Delhi, has decreed the Suit of the Plaintiff / Respondent, Mr. Vinod Kumar Mehta, for Recovery of Possession of the Suit Property, under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.
2. The Plaintiffs / Respondent filed a Civil Suit bearing DJ CS No. 3287/2024 for Possession, Recovery of Arrears of Rent and mesne profits along with pendente lite and future interest and Permanent Injunction.
3. The facts in brief as narrated in the Plaint, are that the erstwhile owners i.e. Mr. Prabir Barua and Smt. Kana Barua, had let out the Ground Floor of the Suit Property to the Defendant, Ms. Chetna Sikdar/Appellant vide Lease Deed dated 19.05.2023, on a monthly rent of Rs.27,000/-, for a period of 11 months, exclusive of electricity, water and common service charges of the society. Clause 10 of the Lease Deed provided for payment of Rs.2,000/- per day as damages, if the Defendant failed to vacate the Proper
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.