$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 27th April, 2026.

+ W.P.(C) 14516/2022 & CM APPL. 56647/2023 JAGRIT KATHURIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar, Advocate.

versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS.

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shivani Kher, Mr. Rakesh Lakra and Mr. Rishabh Shivhare, Advocates for R-2.

Ms. Manisha Agrawal N. and Mr.

Nipun Jain, Advocates for R-3.

Ms. Pearl Sharma, Advocate for R-4.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

JUDGMENT

SANJEEV NARULA, J. (Oral):

1. The Petitioners, who were engaged as teaching faculty in HMR Institute of Technology & Management, have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution assailing the termination notices dated 16^th September, 2022 issued by Respondent No. 2. They also seek reinstatement with consequential benefits.

Facts

2. The dispute, in substance, arises from the termination of teaching faculty by a private unaided college affiliated to the University. The Petitioners were engaged at different stages between 2011 and 2015. Some of them entered service as Lecturers and were later appointed as Assistant Professors. The appoi