Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J
Shewta Tuteja – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petition involves a request to utilize cryopreserved embryos despite the petitioners exceeding the statutory age limits post-initiation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments balance individual reproductive autonomy against mandatory statutory age restrictions in art services. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. purposive interpretation of the art act favors the continuation of reproductive treatment initiated within the legal age limit. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 4. the court grants permission for the specific fet procedure to proceed. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
$~16 *
IN THE MATTER OF:
SHEWTA TUTEJA
R/O RZC-90/2, RAJ NAGAR-II, RAJ
PALAM – II, COLONY, NEW DELHI -110077
......PETITIONER NO.1
RAJESH TUTEJA
R/O RZC-90/2, RAJ NAGAR-II, RAJ
PALAM – II, COLONY, NEW DELHI -110077
……PETITIONER NO. 2 (Through: Mr. Mohit Khandelwal and Mr. Deepak Dahiya, Advocates.)
Versus
UNION OF INDIA
THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH
& WELFARE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MIRMAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI .... RESPONDENT NO.1
NATIONAL ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY
AND SURROGACY BOARD
2nd FLOOR IRCS BUILDING -1, RED CROSS ROAD, NEW DELHI-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
