SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6866

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJESHWAR DAYAL AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
M/S ENICAR MACHINE (INDIA) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SHAIL JAIN, J.

1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the Petitioner/workman assailing the Award dated 03.07.2015 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court-XIX, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in LIR No. 30/2012, whereby the learned Labour Court held that the Government of NCT of Delhi was not the “appropriate Government” for making the reference and consequently held the claim of the Petitioner/workman to be not maintainable before the Labour Court at Delhi.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:

2. Brief facts emerging from the record, necessary for adjudication of the present writ petition, are that the Petitioner/workman claimed to have joined the services of the Respondent/management on 20.11.1978 as a Clerk/Sale Purchase Assistant and alleged that he had continuously worked under the management till November, 2009. It was further the case of the Petitioner/workman that the management had been operating under different names and styles, namely M/s Delhi Industrial Syndicate, M/s Asian Engineering Company, M/s Enicar Machine (India) and M/s Precision Tanks and Vessels (P) Ltd., and that he had worked in all the said establ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top